Current Affairs The WOKE

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is outstanding stuff. Using chat GTP to argue points on a football forum. A new low

Honestly Jimmy, I think it’s a bit unfair to criticise someone for getting their arguments from ChatGPT.

After all…..


When someone accuses you of getting your arguments from ChatGPT, you can respond by explaining your thought process and the role ChatGPT plays in your research or conversations. Here's a general approach:

  1. Acknowledge the accusation calmly: Start by acknowledging their concern without getting defensive. For example, "I understand your concern, but I'd like to clarify how I use ChatGPT in my arguments."
  2. Clarify your use of ChatGPT: Explain that ChatGPT is a tool you use to gather information and explore different perspectives, much like using a search engine or reading books. Emphasize that it's a resource to help you formulate your own ideas.
  3. Highlight critical thinking: Emphasize that you don't blindly accept everything ChatGPT generates. You critically evaluate the information and use it to enhance your understanding and develop your arguments.
  4. Provide examples: Share instances where you've used ChatGPT as a starting point but then conducted further research, cross-referenced sources, and used your own judgment to craft your arguments.
  5. Mention diverse sources: Mention that your arguments are not solely reliant on ChatGPT; you also draw from a variety of sources, including books, articles, personal experiences, and discussions with others.
  6. Invite discussion: Encourage a constructive conversation about the topic at hand. Ask them to specify which aspects of your argument they find questionable and offer to provide additional evidence or reasoning.
  7. Express your commitment to accuracy: Stress your commitment to accuracy and integrity in your discussions and assure them that you value well-informed and balanced viewpoints.
Remember, the key is to demonstrate that ChatGPT is just one of many tools you use to inform your opinions and that you engage in critical thinking and research beyond its initial input.

IMG_0910.webp
 
Honestly Jimmy, I think it’s a bit unfair to criticise someone for getting their arguments from ChatGPT.

After all…..


When someone accuses you of getting your arguments from ChatGPT, you can respond by explaining your thought process and the role ChatGPT plays in your research or conversations. Here's a general approach:

  1. Acknowledge the accusation calmly: Start by acknowledging their concern without getting defensive. For example, "I understand your concern, but I'd like to clarify how I use ChatGPT in my arguments."
  2. Clarify your use of ChatGPT: Explain that ChatGPT is a tool you use to gather information and explore different perspectives, much like using a search engine or reading books. Emphasize that it's a resource to help you formulate your own ideas.
  3. Highlight critical thinking: Emphasize that you don't blindly accept everything ChatGPT generates. You critically evaluate the information and use it to enhance your understanding and develop your arguments.
  4. Provide examples: Share instances where you've used ChatGPT as a starting point but then conducted further research, cross-referenced sources, and used your own judgment to craft your arguments.
  5. Mention diverse sources: Mention that your arguments are not solely reliant on ChatGPT; you also draw from a variety of sources, including books, articles, personal experiences, and discussions with others.
  6. Invite discussion: Encourage a constructive conversation about the topic at hand. Ask them to specify which aspects of your argument they find questionable and offer to provide additional evidence or reasoning.
  7. Express your commitment to accuracy: Stress your commitment to accuracy and integrity in your discussions and assure them that you value well-informed and balanced viewpoints.
Remember, the key is to demonstrate that ChatGPT is just one of many tools you use to inform your opinions and that you engage in critical thinking and research beyond its initial input.

View attachment 229742

Facts of the case are this:

The centrists view point is the majority, not the far left woke. If someone wants to deny that for ideological reasons, then why not use an AI to quickly provide the evidence they want? It’s my argument supplemented by AI.

If they want Harvard referencing etc then pay me to do a report.


As usual, you wokeflakes cannot challenge an argument directly so try to mock and discredit the message. The UK has a majority centrist political viewpoint. F.A.C.T.


You’re constantly making spelling mistakes. Typical anti-woker

So what, I’m sure I’ve managed a few spelling mistakes and or typos. Challenge the argument directly or bore off. You no you can’t. Btw your triggering me hahahhahahahaha

This is outstanding stuff. Using chat GTP to argue points on a football forum. A new low

Better than making stuff up, with no evidence or sources, and then having my lefty wokey pokey friends back me up then living in this alternative reality that exists in your minds.


Anyone else want their a$$ handed to them? 💁🏻‍♂️
 
Facts of the case are this:

The centrists view point is the majority, not the far left woke. If someone wants to deny that for ideological reasons, then why not use an AI to quickly provide the evidence they want? It’s my argument supplemented by AI.

If they want Harvard referencing etc then pay me to do a report.


As usual, you wokeflakes cannot challenge an argument directly so try to mock and discredit the message. The UK has a majority centrist political viewpoint. F.A.C.T.




So what, I’m sure I’ve managed a few spelling mistakes and or typos. Challenge the argument directly or bore off. You no you can’t. Btw your triggering me hahahhahahahaha



Better than making stuff up, with no evidence or sources, and then having my lefty wokey pokey friends back me up then living in this alternative reality that exists in your minds.


Anyone else want their a$$ handed to them? 💁🏻‍♂️
Gammon
 
Facts of the case are this:

The centrists view point is the majority, not the far left woke. If someone wants to deny that for ideological reasons, then why not use an AI to quickly provide the evidence they want? It’s my argument supplemented by AI.

If they want Harvard referencing etc then pay me to do a report.


As usual, you wokeflakes cannot challenge an argument directly so try to mock and discredit the message. The UK has a majority centrist political viewpoint. F.A.C.T.




So what, I’m sure I’ve managed a few spelling mistakes and or typos. Challenge the argument directly or bore off. You no you can’t. Btw your triggering me hahahhahahahaha



Better than making stuff up, with no evidence or sources, and then having my lefty wokey pokey friends back me up then living in this alternative reality that exists in your minds.


Anyone else want their a$$ handed to them? 💁🏻‍♂️
Yes big D, not sure you understand the concept of ‘fact’ so this is going to be difficult I think.
 
Racist



“In 2018, it became particularly known as a term to describe either those on the political right or those who supported Brexit.[1][4] Due to its referencing of skin colour, there is controversy as to whether the term is racist.[a]


If we use the woke usual, lived experience mantra, then it is racist because I say it is. Typical wokey hate that then do it yourself.

Is Wikipedia triggering for you lot?, ohhhh look he used Wikipedia, he cannot do that, anyone can edit it probably edit it himself 🥱
 
Facts of the case are this:
The centrists view point is the majority, not the far left woke. If someone wants to deny that for ideological reasons, then why not use an AI to quickly provide the evidence they want? It’s my argument supplemented by AI.
If they want Harvard referencing etc then pay me to do a report.
As usual, you wokeflakes cannot challenge an argument directly so try to mock and discredit the message. The UK has a majority centrist political viewpoint. F.A.C.T.
So what, I’m sure I’ve managed a few spelling mistakes and or typos. Challenge the argument directly or bore off. You no you can’t. Btw your triggering me hahahhahahahaha
Better than making stuff up, with no evidence or sources, and then having my lefty wokey pokey friends back me up then living in this alternative reality that exists in your minds.
Anyone else want their a$$ handed to them? 💁🏻‍♂️
pay me to stop spelling mi$take$!?!

Why do dullards such as this carbuncle of creep waste their time?
 
Racist



“In 2018, it became particularly known as a term to describe either those on the political right or those who supported Brexit.[1][4] Due to its referencing of skin colour, there is controversy as to whether the term is racist.[a]


If we use the woke usual, lived experience mantra, then it is racist because I say it is. Typical wokey hate that then do it yourself.

Is Wikipedia triggering for you lot?, ohhhh look he used Wikipedia, he cannot do that, anyone can edit it probably edit it himself 🥱
Ok…. [Poor language removed]
 
And using AI to generate a photo of two steak dinners as well.
For him and woman on date
Facts of the case are this:

The centrists view point is the majority, not the far left woke. If someone wants to deny that for ideological reasons, then why not use an AI to quickly provide the evidence they want? It’s my argument supplemented by AI.

If they want Harvard referencing etc then pay me to do a report.


As usual, you wokeflakes cannot challenge an argument directly so try to mock and discredit the message. The UK has a majority centrist political viewpoint. F.A.C.T.




So what, I’m sure I’ve managed a few spelling mistakes and or typos. Challenge the argument directly or bore off. You no you can’t. Btw your triggering me hahahhahahahaha



Better than making stuff up, with no evidence or sources, and then having my lefty wokey pokey friends back me up then living in this alternative reality that exists in your minds.


Anyone else want their a$$ handed to them? 💁🏻‍♂️
Can you point us to a paper that you have published mate; I presume you have written some form a published article given your work in the scientific field.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top