I find supporting the idea that naked individuals being exposed to children potentially almost paedaphillic in some elements so it is strange so many people would support that? Behind closed doors if an adult took their clothes off in front of a child that was not his , it would be classed in that bracket but it is acceptable to be done in public? Just generally the lack of importance placed on young children and this sort of exposure is quite worrying stance to have when western society tries so hard to protect children from this sort of thing and it is almost like people are accepting of those exposures and therefore more sympathetic to exposing young children to sexuality which is not the morally good one.
You've literally described the two different contexts where something is acceptable and not acceptable.
One year when I was maybe 6 or 7 my dad accidentally booked us into a camp site in St Tropez that was for nudists, Germans getting about everywhere with their kit out. There was nothing remotely threatening or sexual about it, unlike had he booked us into a non nudist camp site for a German to expose themselves to me in a private area.
I've never been to a parade of the sort being discussed so have never taken my kids to one either by default, and that's the choice we can all make as adults who are responsible for children. It was a small group of LGBT people who are also nudists, they also appear to be one of the unsexiest groups of people at the event do nothing remotely sexual.
From Hume to Haidt, it has been pretty well demonstrated we're all emotional beings with our reasoning being secondary and only seeking to support our emotional preference, so I would wonder what is going on here with the reactionary right's obsession with children being exposed to anything LGBTQI+ related?
It's obvious that these parades all contain willing participants, in the parade and those watching. That itself should be celebrated in a free society by conservatives and progressives alike.