Good question, the people attacking the woke agenda in Australia never seem to quite explain what the woke agenda actually is, but they do seem to be very worried about it.Which is what exactly?
Good question, the people attacking the woke agenda in Australia never seem to quite explain what the woke agenda actually is, but they do seem to be very worried about it.Which is what exactly?
You did it again. You justified wanting something because it hurts the right. I think at this point we have to ask who the hater really is...But no one is getting a veto, you just made that part up. Which is pretty weird to be honest.
But I agree it will be funny if the yes vote wins - all those racist snowflakes seething in anger because we will be letting aboriginal people share their opinion on aboriginal matters.
Someone else on the SS happy. There really are some extreme saddos where any means for these people is justified provided the ends is harming whatever is dressed up as the right. Thanks for making my point so vividly. Everything I've in fact been saying in the last few posts has been summed up in those 3 lines.Right wing bullshit. More excuses for hate and justification of inequality. Capitalism works within a framework. That has been torn apart by corporations. It is out of control so they blame the decent and tolerant by labelling them marxists.
Marxists, Immigrants, Gay, Transexual. The right wing fascist playbook repeats itself. My tolerance ends with these scum who frankly should not be breathing.
You need to understand and appreciate the difference between a 'justification' and a 'consequence'.You did it again. You justified wanting something because it hurts the right. I think at this point we have to ask who the hater really is...
How do you feel about making a fool of yourself earlier, you know, when you filled your pants over the name of a QLD suburb, because you thought it meant something else?Someone else on the SS happy. There really are some extreme saddos where any means for these people is justified provided the ends is harming whatever is dressed up as the right. Thanks for making my point so vividly. Everything I've in fact been saying in the last few posts has been summed up in those 3 lines.
Sorry mate, I don't indulge in strawman arguments.You did it again. You justified wanting something because it hurts the right. I think at this point we have to ask who the hater really is...
What else needs to be discussed? The point that I was making has just been emphatically proven thanks to @WA Toffee and @Rob17896 . When people rationalise apartheid and a genocide for anyone because they're 'right' wing. I believe that's called the clincher.How do you feel about making a fool of yourself earlier, you know, when you filled your pants over the name of a QLD suburb, because you thought it meant something else?
If you’re so stupid that you misunderstand something so simple and easy to check, why should anybody take any of your arguments seriously?
What else needs to be discussed? The point that I was making has just been emphatically proven thanks to @WA Toffee and @Rob17896 . When people rationalise apartheid and a genocide for anyone because they're 'right' wing. I believe that's called the clincher.
Interestingly, nobody, including yourself, has so far condemned the hate or even referenced it as in any way as remarkable. Let's ignore it shall we? All the while I've been accused of hate just because I put up a few articles of woke people suggesting they are deeply corrosive to society.
I'm sure you're a well meaning person, but when you repeat the same mistake a second time that's not a strawman argument. That's evidence of a pattern. You may want to reflect upon that. You were motivated by harm or hatred for others.Sorry mate, I don't indulge in strawman arguments.
You want to discuss, let's discuss. You want to act all edgy to win arguments on the internet, I'll just ignore you.
Which point of yours did I manage to prove? That you deal in strawman arguments to try and be edgy? Can't think of any otherWhat else needs to be discussed? The point that I was making has just been emphatically proven thanks to @WA Toffee and @Rob17896 . When people rationalise apartheid and a genocide for anyone because they're 'right' wing. I believe that's called the clincher.
Interestingly, nobody, including yourself, has so far condemned the hate or even referenced it as in any way as remarkable. Let's ignore it shall we? All the while I've been accused of hate just because I put up a few articles of woke people suggesting they are deeply corrosive to society.
I'm sure you're a well meaning person, but when you repeat the same mistake a second time that's not a strawman argument. That's evidence of a pattern. You may want to reflect upon that. You were motivated by harm or hatred for others.
Nice try mate, but still not engaging in it. But you keep making things up and pretending other posters said them if that's how you get your jollies. Good luck to youI'm sure you're a well meaning person, but when you repeat the same mistake a second time that's not a strawman argument. That's evidence of a pattern. You may want to reflect upon that. You were motivated by harm or hatred for others.
Yeah, worst thing is, he only started claiming that after I said "I agree with you"And you are not?
I want to keep the conversation light hearted too. This thread has become weirdly angry (and don't go accusing me for that), but let's not hide away from what is a serious issue here. The woke and the left are just as volatile and capable of wicked things as the right. Was there not a trans person who went into a Christian school recently and killed adults and children there? This does happen and fuelling or ignoring hate does nobody any good.We do see a lot of Woke terrorist attacks to be fair and Wokes going into schools shooting people. They’re a disgrace.
Well in TL for bringing this to our attention. We shall analyse the data and revert back soon.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.