the rep bars...

SuitsBlue · September 8, 2008

would be nice if it was possible for the posts that have incurred positive or negative 'reputation points' to be indicated as such. currently we have a game of hide and seek in terms of finding the nice and the not so comments left for each account.

i think that makes sense.

Brownie · November 1, 2008

GrandOldTeam said:
It was just because you were negative rating for no reason, and a ridiculous amount. Literally 90% of negative feedback was left by you - and for no obvious reason. We had to keep some credibility to the system.

Anyway, two clean sheets and the ban has been lifted. Any more schenanigans and your banned from using it until Tony Hibbert scores

ToxtethBlue said:
Fair enough, I'll use it sparingly from now on.

And I'll make sure my comments are relevent to the post I am repping.

Ahahaha, a sterling effort.

Seamus Colemole · November 2, 2008

Nebbiolo said:
I know the film. I saw about half of it before collapsing in a stupor, many years ago. It was one of the ones that nearly got banned, but avoided it by the skin of its teeth. I used to love the old pre-certs, especially the 39 or so banned ones (of which most were truly, truly terrible).

Have you seen Cannibal Holocaust?

Being banned was the best thing that happened to most of those films!

Yeah i've got a dodgy VHS imported copy of Cannibal Holocaust which i'm assuming should be the fully uncut version. Its a good film. Draws you into the story and conflicting emotions. Much better than most Cannibal films.

Nebbiolo · November 2, 2008

deathbyropeandglass said:
Being banned was the best thing that happened to most of those films!

Yeah i've got a dodgy VHS imported copy of Cannibal Holocaust which i'm assuming should be the fully uncut version. Its a good film. Draws you into the story and conflicting emotions. Much better than most Cannibal films.

The worst one is Cannibal Terror. Truly, it is so awful that some of the actors playing the cannibals keep bursting into laughter when they think they're off camera. It isn't even good for a laugh.

Terreur cannibale (1981)

Reidy's Bottle Of Grecian · November 10, 2008

so has tb got back the right to rep, he's now pos repping those he negged

i gpt one signed by him anyway. (y)

TsarDiniyar · November 11, 2008

anyway of changing it slightly so we can rep same people slightly more frequently

Bruce Wayne · November 11, 2008

That is an option in the admin panel, along with a range of other things. Don't know what it's set to at the moment though.

Cal · November 11, 2008

TB is back at it again, i see.

Reidy's Bottle Of Grecian · November 11, 2008

he's raising a posse cal

Cal · November 11, 2008

Reidy's Bottle Of Grecian said:
he's raising a posse cal

I wouldn't be suprised if he hasnt harmed your rep, mate.

Reidy's Bottle Of Grecian · November 11, 2008

Cal said:
I wouldn't be suprised if he hasnt harmed your rep, mate.

au contraire

Slight_Return · November 12, 2008

Bruce Wayne said:
That is an option in the admin panel, along with a range of other things. Don't know what it's set to at the moment though.

Bill Kenwright stingy (allegedly)

Neiler · November 12, 2008

Could we look at the spreading around rules, seems you have to be a right rep hoe, and speread it around loads before you can give somone more rep. Generally good posts come form a good poster and as such it would be nioce to be able to rep people in terms for all their good posts instead of having to speread it around.

Blue Ray · November 12, 2008

Its out of order getting a neg rep for a post that couldnt possibly offend anyone. Got a good idea who it was. Nice one [Poor language removed] face. Yours will arrive shortly.

Vim Fuego · November 12, 2008

woody3660 said:
Its out of order getting a neg rep for a post that couldnt possibly offend anyone. Got a good idea who it was. Nice one [Poor language removed] face. Yours will arrive shortly.

Love it, and much deserving of rep