Here is some more whataboutery and enjoy this context...Whataboutery is hardly uncalled for in this context.
If Blair appoints 374 peers in just over ten years, Cameron appoints 240 or so in six, and Johnson appoints 36, this means that both parties are appointing members at about the same rate.
Both sides sell peerages to their allies when they have power. Labour is just a little more insistent on form, and that the peerage be purchased with time spent on causes the party favors rather than mere filthy lucre. It's the whole point of a peerage system - it creates something of value the crown or government can use to bribe people into doing things. All recognition systems work like this, to a greater or lesser degree, if we're being honest with ourselves.
Here is some more whataboutery and enjoy this context...
Pete brushes it off that "they're all the same", so he gets away with treating us like mugs.This Cnut thinks he is untouchable. He probably is in this mess of a country with the absolute weapons he has backing him.
Even the people who know what a class A Cnut he is just turn a blind eye.
Zero redeemable qualities.
Would be inclined to have Cameron above him to be honest. He created this mess then hid in his shed.Quite possibly the worst PM in history - certainly relatively modern history. Including Chamberlain, Eden and Brown.
A little piggy that made off on his trotters to allow his old Bullingdon boy mate billy bunter into the running!Would be inclined to have Cameron above him to be honest. He created this mess then hid in his shed.
History will not be kind to this lot. PMs always care very much about their legacy and it gives me a great deal of pleasure that Cameron knows exactly what his defining legacy is.
lol Get in the bin you corrupt wastrel.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.