Lapeno77
Player Valuation: £35m
Enjoy it while it lasts. Maybe the last ride for this venerable duo
Current Affairs The next Tory (strong and stable) leader is Boris Johnson
- Thread starter summerisle
- Start date
- Status
tsubaki
Player Valuation: £90m
can’t come quickly enough, at least by reading this scribble from one of them:
Owen Paterson row: A quick but damaging U-turn
Tory MPs are furious that they were forced to vote for a controversial measure that was dropped hours later.
www.bbc.co.uk
“social media blitz” / “made mistakes” ffs
A complete, total embarrassment from the Tories. True incompetence. That Rees-Mogg is the biggest blagger you'll ever see in your life - he has a career solely because of his affected mannerisms as a 'blue blood'.
They're a disgrace to the country, the lot of them. Rayner should have stood by what she said - Tory politicians are scum.
They're a disgrace to the country, the lot of them. Rayner should have stood by what she said - Tory politicians are scum.
can’t come quickly enough, at least by reading this scribble from one of them:
Owen Paterson row: A quick but damaging U-turn
Tory MPs are furious that they were forced to vote for a controversial measure that was dropped hours later.
“social media blitz” / “made mistakes” ffs
Once Paterson came out last night in all his arrogance and said he'd do the same thing again, this was a matter of time.
If they were capable of it, they should be feeling utter shame about what they did, every last one of them.
tsubaki
Player Valuation: £90m
Arise Lord Owen:
www.theguardian.com
Owen Paterson resigns as MP for North Shropshire after sleaze row – as it happened
Owen Paterson says ‘I will remain a public servant but outside the cruel world of politics’ as he steps down
tsubaki
Player Valuation: £90m
TBF it was doomed the moment they tried to do it, given how blatant the offences were (and how they were evidenced by Paterson’s own evidence never mind what the regulator found). Rees-Mogg got badly chewed up, including by Chris Bryant(!) yesterday in the Commons when he tried to push this.
They probably just thought that because their papers and friendly hacks went along with it that everyone else would, as happened with Filkin. Now they probably think that everyone will just forget about it, and they’ll be aided by the same papers and hacks.
Should change the title of this thread back to its original title imho. When they show you who they really are, believe it.
orchard
Player Valuation: £60m
Wrong thread mate?
NilSatisOptimum
Player Valuation: £70m
Real stinging rebuke from Lord Evans, the former MI5 boss, likened this move to how Iran is Governed.
www.gov.uk
Upholding Standards in Public Life - Speech by Lord Evans
Lord Evans gave the keynote speech to the Institute for Government's One Day Conference on Ethical Standards in Government, reflecting on the Committee's recent report, Upholding Standards in Public Life.
Martin Alvito
Player Valuation: £50m
There is absolutely nothing about this on the main BBC website or the news page when I pull them up. I would imagine that those of you living in the UK are having a very different experience.
I'm floored. The only reasonable conclusion is that the BBC is targeting the content it shows me on the basis of my IP and content history. I don't know whether they think that I wouldn't be interested based upon where I live and the content I generally pull up, or that they're concealing the public shame. Either way, it's one thing when I build a news feed to show me what I want to see, and quite another when a state-owned enterprise ostensibly operating in the public interest determines what I see on the basis of what they think I will, or should, click on.
It's not a good look, because it makes it seem as though the BBC is deliberately suppressing the top political story in the UK.
Not a surprise. Johnson did Ed Woodward the same way on the European Super League.
I'm floored. The only reasonable conclusion is that the BBC is targeting the content it shows me on the basis of my IP and content history. I don't know whether they think that I wouldn't be interested based upon where I live and the content I generally pull up, or that they're concealing the public shame. Either way, it's one thing when I build a news feed to show me what I want to see, and quite another when a state-owned enterprise ostensibly operating in the public interest determines what I see on the basis of what they think I will, or should, click on.
It's not a good look, because it makes it seem as though the BBC is deliberately suppressing the top political story in the UK.
Not a surprise. Johnson did Ed Woodward the same way on the European Super League.
- Status