Unless there's a widespread commitment to forensically and fairly look at all organisations for online content that pertains to them and their actions by their members and supporters then any report on a single organisation is ridiculous and lacking in context.
The stark truth is that LP members and supporters are by and large much more enlightened than all or most other members of other organisations, and to target that party for an investigation is not only unfair but bizarre...bizarre if we didn't also appreciate the wider dimension to the debate: the neecessity to get rid of any leaders of an organisation not committed to neo-liberlaism.
The EHRC might be getting 'good' press, but it's terribly flawed in conception as well as it's conclusions.
I remember Martin Mguinnes saying something similar years ago when people wanted to out the link between Sinn Fein nd the PIRA. He rightly point out, he would do it but only if the British state, loyalist para's and the death squads that targetted often older family members of activists were looked into. It was all or nothing. Surprisingly as soon as that was suggested the calls went away,
My view of the LP has always been it's a broad representation of the working class. And there is racism, sexism, homophobia within the working class. There are also lots of people opposed to it. You are not going to eliminate any of those prejudices while we have the economic system we do and Labour remain a very central part of it, try as we might.
I've just seen the EHRC has ignored Muslim Tory grandees, the Muslim Council of Britain who provided a 300 pagedossier asking them to investigate Conservative Party Racism. I would love to know why they felt the Muslim community, who had seemingly produced overwhelming evidence were not only wrong, but so wrong it didn't even warrant even a cursory glance. Are these really the people who are trustworthy in judging who is, or who isn't racist?
