Current Affairs The Labour Party

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Comparative salary in the private sector"

-- is this a joke?
As an example (given your apparent expertise in entrepreneurship)

 
Well you're making a good fist of defending the indefensible on tuition fees.

Universities are broke because tuition fees haven't risen in line with inflation, meaning graduates today have saved a couple of grand compared to graduates who went through the system when fees were first introduced. I'm curious how it's considered socialist to ask people on a minimum wage to pay for the education of high-earning graduates, rather than the beneficiaries of the education (ie the graduate) paying a chunk of their education (still not the entire sum, as we can see what that is based on what overseas students pay)? Or are you a champagne socialist Dave?
Another big cuase is the massive drop off in foreign students coming to the UK to study. Who basically subsidised tuition fees for us born here and chose Uni. The price of sovereignty and keeping our culture.
 
Yes I would. But apparently Imperial College London has over 1200 members of staff on £100,000 pa…….
Imperial are a bit of a weird outlier in the sector Pete.

They go outside of the national pay bargaining structures and don't consistently use the single salary spine, therefore their pay deals look peculiar compared to, say, Loughborough up the road from you.

Institutions like Imperial aren't actually the ones at risk - Global reputation, large number of international post-grads, high research and commercial income etc which offsets the costs of home tuition fee erosion.

The smaller universities, particularly those focused on teaching or with a smaller research base are the ones struggling.

Unfortunately people don't recognise HE as an ecosystem with different types of institutions having different strengths, roles and capabilities. The fixation is on the 'elite' institutions dominates, more often than not, by those from wealthy backgrounds. Quite often the derided institutions provide an opportunity for those from less wealthy backgrounds.

Not to mention capacity - you want nurses, physios, paramedics etc? Shut the less prestigious unis, training capacity collapses.

So it needs to be paid for. Tax payer or student loan? Someone won't be happy.

Having said all that, I think executive pay in the sector is a problem. The VC at the Institution I am about to leave was awarded a 13 or 15% pay rise for, well, we aren't quite sure.
 
Last edited:
As an example (given your apparent expertise in entrepreneurship)

Couldn't recruit post doctoral researchers to a project for similar reasons. Why use that PhD on a fixed term contract paying £34k when you can coin it in the private sector?
 
….some years ago now, but my daughter studied Medicine at Liverpool University and there wasn’t a single lecture to attend. Instead the course was based on ‘Problem Based Learning’, where groups of students worked by themselves to identify solutions to problems set. It was before the huge hike in tuition fees, but it was 5 years and it made me wonder what she was paying for.

My son was the other side of the hike, the debt was significant even though he lived at home. Fortunately we were able to clear it for him but I would never trust Student Loans Company of keeping accurate records, they were in a right mess. Those loans can be a millstone for many years, surely there has to be a better way of paying for our youngsters education.
 
Couldn't recruit post doctoral researchers to a project for similar reasons. Why use that PhD on a fixed term contract paying £34k when you can coin it in the private sector?
And with Imperial being renowned for its expertise in STEM, it's perhaps not that hard to see why they'd need to pay a bit more to keep faculty.
 
Universities are broke because tuition fees haven't risen in line with inflation, meaning graduates today have saved a couple of grand compared to graduates who went through the system when fees were first introduced. I'm curious how it's considered socialist to ask people on a minimum wage to pay for the education of high-earning graduates, rather than the beneficiaries of the education (ie the graduate) paying a chunk of their education (still not the entire sum, as we can see what that is based on what overseas students pay)? Or are you a champagne socialist Dave?
So utterly pathetic in 'reasoning' that it deserves zero response.
 
Another big cuase is the massive drop off in foreign students coming to the UK to study. Who basically subsidised tuition fees for us born here and chose Uni. The price of sovereignty and keeping our culture.
The way tuition fees are factored in as part of the 'obvious' requirements of higher education is the real issue here...that's why the 'radical' Starmer leadership bid promised scrapping them altogether...just a ruse to con the LP membership - the way he'd go on to con the fools who fell for his blarney at the last election.

Imagine not seeing his broken promises in the election campaign coming a mile off when the previous 4 years of u-turns and broken promises was there for all to see before last July?

You'd have to have been utterly 'kin thick not to have foreseen this Starmer Gang's trajectory.

Lol.
 


pinnochio-lies.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top