i've had to cut and paste as the fecking connection went for a burton.
...........
Terminator II.
so, the bad cyborg that was crushed in a compactor beyond recognition at the end of the first film (1984), makes a Lazarus type comeback in the second, exactly the same, and is tweaked to become a GOOD terminator? :blink:
stroll on.
First it's hunting down Sarah Connor intent on killing her, the next it's doing everything in it's power to protect her.
Bloody nonsense that is.
and furthermore, that horrible whiny kid in the second, just makes me want to punch the screen.
I haven't actually seen the third yet, why they waited twelve years to do the third installment I don't know.
It's like the 3rd and 4th Die Hard movies, too much of a gap in between.
The fact that an almost indestructable cyborg has been sent back in time to assassinate the unborn leader/teenage version of an organisation that will end up fighting a resistance war against computers is fine, that a fancy new cyborg made from mimetic polyalloy that can change into any non-complex machinery is fine; but the fact that they found an intact arm and a damaged cpu chip, reverse engineered it then re-programmed - what is essentially a computer after all - it to follow different orders is hard to swallow?
Fair enough with the whiny kid though. It took so long to film that he aged so much (visably if you can be bothered to check) that his voice broke mid-shoot and they had to synthetically pitch it to the same level.

Even more fantasy than aliens picking off Spec Ops teams one-by-one.