Current Affairs The " another shooting in America " thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 28206
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you think Hitler would have been able to invade so many European countries successfully if the citizens were actually armed to the teeth?

My point is not a "hypothesis". There have been studies based on the whole holocaust and disarmament of the Jewish population. Before WW2, the Jewish and other minorities had their guns taken away. If you don't believe me, you can go away and research this topic. If the Jews were armed to the same extent as the Texans, the holocaust on a mass level would have been prevented.

Nothing I've stated is disturbing. I'm offering a new perspective in which people don't want to believe in.
Just like the heavily armed Texans who stopped the Uvalde shooter?

You’re right that your point isn’t a hypothesis, it’s outright bulls*it. Every credible study that has ever been done indicates owning a gun makes the owner LESS safe. You’re far more likely to either use the gun on yourself, or have it used on you than you ever are to use it in self defense.

As to your last sentence, you’re damn right. “Eight year olds being slaughtered at school is just the cost of doing business” is a perspective I don’t want to, and refuse to believe in.
 
Do you think Hitler would have been able to invade so many European countries successfully if the citizens were actually armed to the teeth?

My point is not a "hypothesis". There have been studies based on the whole holocaust and disarmament of the Jewish population. Before WW2, the Jewish and other minorities had their guns taken away. If you don't believe me, you can go away and research this topic. If the Jews were armed to the same extent as the Texans, the holocaust on a mass level would have been prevented.

Nothing I've stated is disturbing. I'm offering a new perspective in which people don't want to believe in.
You utter clown.

Heres a few examples.

The Romans, the Vikings and Great Britain.

Just 3 "nations" that managed to control the whole world despite the people having access to the same weapons they had.

Even with guns, people can not defeat armies.
 
You utter clown.

Heres a few examples.

The Romans, the Vikings and Great Britain.

Just 3 "nations" that managed to control the whole world despite the people having access to the same weapons they had.

Even with guns, people can not defeat armies.
Wait…you mean you don’t back yourself and your AR-15 when the military calls in a drone strike?
 
Do you think Hitler would have been able to invade so many European countries successfully if the citizens were actually armed to the teeth?

My point is not a "hypothesis". There have been studies based on the whole holocaust and disarmament of the Jewish population. Before WW2, the Jewish and other minorities had their guns taken away. If you don't believe me, you can go away and research this topic. If the Jews were armed to the same extent as the Texans, the holocaust on a mass level would have been prevented.

Nothing I've stated is disturbing. I'm offering a new perspective in which people don't want to believe in.
I'm sure you'll be able to give me chapter and verse on the gun laws in every country Hitler invaded. I mean obviously you would, or you wouldn't make the claim, would you?

Can you link me to these studies, please?

And how would 6 million jews across Europe have stood up to the luftwaffe, panzer corps and SS?
 
Do you think Hitler would have been able to invade so many European countries successfully if the citizens were actually armed to the teeth?

My point is not a "hypothesis". There have been studies based on the whole holocaust and disarmament of the Jewish population. Before WW2, the Jewish and other minorities had their guns taken away. If you don't believe me, you can go away and research this topic. If the Jews were armed to the same extent as the Texans, the holocaust on a mass level would have been prevented.

Nothing I've stated is disturbing. I'm offering a new perspective in which people don't want to believe in.

What a load of tosh, not true at all.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_gun_control_argument
 
Do you think Hitler would have been able to invade so many European countries successfully if the citizens were actually armed to the teeth?

My point is not a "hypothesis". There have been studies based on the whole holocaust and disarmament of the Jewish population. Before WW2, the Jewish and other minorities had their guns taken away. If you don't believe me, you can go away and research this topic. If the Jews were armed to the same extent as the Texans, the holocaust on a mass level would have been prevented.

Nothing I've stated is disturbing. I'm offering a new perspective in which people don't want to believe in.

By the way, how many people died in the Holocaust?
 
Hitler was able to carry out the systemic genocide because the Jews and the other minorities were largely unarmed. Do you seriously think the Nazis would have been able to kill 6 millions of Jews if every Jew was armed to the teeth?

I'm proud as an American that our citizens will always have power against our government, something that can't be said about European countries.
You’re a total prick

Sorry mods.. I’ll take my ban
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top