Probably NSFW.
Probably NSFW.
Pack of poorly trained animals, the way they spoke about it beforehand like they are playing GTA, sickening
Probably NSFW.
Probably NSFW.
Pack of poorly trained animals, the way they spoke about it beforehand like they are playing GTA, sickening
the whole event sickened me rather than the language and tone of the conversation, but the tone was telling and gung ho. The police are an extension of other problems with american gun violence but a problem all the same, and the willingness to empty a gun into individuals is both a product of the gun culture in america but also poor training, many elements of american police work fall too much into shock and awe territory, their traffic chase tactics, crowd control tactics and disarm and approach tactics and all result in violence and all too often the loss of life, further distancing the police from communities, the black communities in particular. This opinion has been reinforced to me by american security specialists and former police, but whatever, thats as far as 'justifying' my opinion to you as I will go. Far far too many have died at the hands of the police in the US, and far too many didn't have toDo explain...
...do justify your 'poorly trained animals' comment! What did they say that 'sickened' you? Did you not hear the discussion, at length, of how they wanted to open the door quickly and snatch his gun away?
In this clip, despite being heavily edited by THE GUARDIAN, the officers came across as quite professional to me.
Not sure it’s professional to put 25 bullets into a sleeping man who is just coming around. They have been called to check he is okay and seemingly they barely even try to check on him other than saying they will try to snatch his gun but “you know what to do”. Didn’t try to wake him, asked him to show his hands after 6 men shot him at once. The Guardian video may be edited but from what I’ve read that actually makes the police come off a bit better.Do explain...
...do justify your 'poorly trained animals' comment! What did they say that 'sickened' you? Did you not hear the discussion, at length, of how they wanted to open the door quickly and snatch his gun away?
In this clip, despite being heavily edited by THE GUARDIAN, the officers came across as quite professional to me.
While not condoning their actions overall, to simply try and wake a suspect while they have a loaded pistol (or at least one in the chamber) on their lap...Not sure it’s professional to put 25 bullets into a sleeping man who is just coming around. They have been called to check he is okay and seemingly they barely even try to check on him other than saying they will try to snatch his gun but “you know what to do”. Didn’t try to wake him, asked him to show his hands after 6 men shot him at once. The Guardian video may be edited but from what I’ve read that actually makes the police come off a bit better.
If that had been a white man sat in a silver Mercedes I am 99.9% certain they wouldn't have put 25 bullets into him for moving a bit when he woke up.While not condoning their actions overall, to simply try and wake a suspect while they have a loaded pistol (or at least one in the chamber) on their lap...
... has its own significant risks to the officers. Does that justify their comments, demeanour and the final action? Well it's more than questionable.
I feel that the full video does show some movement within the car towards the direction of their firearm, which will rightly or wrongly possibly excuse the officers.
I'm not suggesting that you're incorrect as there's certainly still significant racial issues in the US, including with some forms of law enforcement. You may be right.If that had been a white man sat in a silver Mercedes I am 99.9% certain they wouldn't have put 25 bullets into him for moving a bit when he woke up.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.