97 pages down and I'm still none the wiser about why anyone gives a toss about Andrew Tate.
Taking ALL his claims at face value, simply as a point of reference:
He's better at chess than the average random dude. Ok, well done.
He used to be (still is?) a very high-level kickboxer. Ok, that's an achievement. Fair enough.
He's wealthy to a hotly-debated extent. Ok, that matters to / impresses some people.
He lives in Romania. So what?
He has a silly accent. Doesn't matter at all.
Literally the ONLY thing I've seen mentioned about him in this thread that has caused any response in me OTHER than a shrug is the news that he's currently under investigation for some kind of alleged people trafficking activity. That's a criminal activity and if it's proved then he'll be a convicted people-trafficker.
So in summary, he's of literally no interest. If he's been up to no good then I hope he's punished, but otherwise he's just another person. More money than the average, but just not remotely noteworthy.
I know two people who are definitely more wealthy than him, and they would be of no interest to anyone on this forum either because they are just normal people who happen to run two successful businesses. One's a residential property developer from Norfolk, the other is a commercial property landlord in Essex. The only things they do differently to Mr. Tate is they don't pick fights on twitter with Scandinavian teenagers, they don't post videos of their own theories about gender and politics on the internet and they've never been arrested on suspicion of people trafficking. I'd add their Twitter handles so you can follow them, but neither of them ever post anything.