To be fair Michael Hesseltine was a good man and did as much as was possible to rescue Liverpool and Merseyside from the ravages of Thatcher.
I am genuinely struggling to think of any other policy or individual worthy of praise.
That's not good is it? I mean the Sutton Trust released a report over the summer highlighting the positive improvements made by academy schools since their inception. That's a good example of something both parties could justly be proud of.
Likewise, Dave posted a link to a Scottish think tank (a left leaning one) earlier in this thread, and they had some good stuff on just that kind of localisation of power, and referenced some excellent projects on participatory budgeting and the like, together with some good points on the importance of open data. Those are things that are simply good governance and not party political.
If we're to have fine public services, I don't think we can put blinkers on and discard things that work just because of who implements them. We need to be both open to ideas, and adaptive enough to both try them out, and discard those that don't work.
In most walks of life, failure is seen as a part of the learning process. I'm sure you can see that this is certainly not the case in politics, where failure is seen as the end of all things and a damning indictment of everything that person/department/party stands for. It's crazy.
We need to be grown up about this, and a good place to start would be to get rid of the tribalism that so infects modern politics. It's not helpful one bit.