I have no idea what goes on behind closed doors. But it appears from the outside to very much work linearly by position. Wouldn't it make more sense to have a top 2 or 3 by role that we would be happy with and would improve us. We work across all of the tier 1 prospects by position concurrently and communicate a hard date to get them in and we are also talking to others. Then you have tier 2 if the player and the club say no. It seems like we work on a target and if they say no we seem start fresh on the next target.
I think the Tete situation kind of reinforces that impression. We were working hard on a RB clearly to be a starter and now nothing for a month until ANM.
I'm sure I am probably wrong but it sure does feel this way from the outside.
Excluding the signings made, the way I'd look at it with
Moyes saying he wanted up to 10 players is to have 3 options in play for each of the other 6 transfers.
So that's 18 prospective signings in play. If rejected by each and every one of your top 6 targets, you still have 12 in play.
Getting 4 from 12 seems modest and doable even if you've had to work down the list.
The way things are developing though, they might all very well be loans. They seem stuck in a bind between needing numbers but not convinced about the players they might be able to get, so that's where the stopgap loan solution comes in.
Going into Sept 1 and needing to do that much business is very risky though and an indication of failure.