Thats the thing mate, I dont believe that we have a set of ideals set up at all, or a plan moving forward, if we would have come out after removing Koeman and got Allardyce in, then I could maybe say well we are looking at managers which while play different are both a little pragmatic.
We didnt though, it was so scattergun.
No-one knows what he does, or is meant to do - all we can do is speculate based on what a traditional DoF would do, and like I say in my opinion he fails against that.
He does how ever completely need to be held accountable for the mess in the summer - quite simply to put the blame solely on Koemans head is wrong, he needs to take a fair share of it - in his own words he needs to agree on the player, so he has just as much reason to have his head on the block.
I dont disagree with that mate, if you look at our approach and philosophy its flip floped from,
Moyes, Martinez, Koeman, Allardyce, four very different managers, styles of play. doesn't seem to be an identity or ideals, that always comes from the top down and maybe its evident of the boardroom dynamic presently.
i dont necessarily disagree with you, i think our objectives throughout the season and even during the recruitment changed as the risk changed for the club. Its was reactive instead of reflective. again that top down for me anyway.
Were we differ, perhaps is were we think Walsh fits into all this, for me i think largely recruitment has been good, player trading has improved signifcanlyy, maximizing assets has been brilliant. I can see his effectiveness.
Whether his role has influenced basket case decisions at board level is a matter of or debate, personally i dont think so. we have a very wired and to my mind set up top presently and i think that is where our problems lie. If im honest i think Walsh has had to come into a chaotic system.