Steve Walsh - no longer our Director of Football

Steve Walsh as DOF

  • IN

    Votes: 52 6.0%
  • OUT

    Votes: 727 84.4%
  • Shake it all about

    Votes: 82 9.5%

  • Total voters
    861
Status
Not open for further replies.
We're going off topic here, I was just attempting to point out that it doesn't really help anyone when people come on here making statements as if they're facts when they don't know the ins and outs.

You appear to think that I'm trying to suggest we have major issues but I'm not at all. The examples I used were not an attempt at hinting at something sinister, I was simply using them to highlight that sometimes people are quick to assume everything is fine when it isn't. But seeing as you ask, I'll answer the points.

1. You're assuming again, and putting the blame on those outside the club when you have no evidence to suggest that's the case - you're not catching on very quickly.
2. No we didn't just get Valencia on loan, but then I didn't say we did, did I? The point was that throughout the summer people kept saying 'don't panic, everythings fine, we're going to sign loads of boss players'. We didn't, and both the manager and major shareholder went on record as saying it had been a disappointment.
3. It's a pretty well known figure of speech, I'm surprised you haven't come across it before. In case you're not aware, the academy director left his post very suddenly and unexpectedly so the idiom seemed an apt one to use.

1. Well you're assuming again blah blah blah. An offer has been submitted, Barkley has rejected it. That's basically a fact. The rest is conjecture, I suppose, but I very much doubt the bigger teams are after him.
2. No he didn't say, your post heavily implied it though. Your point becomes irrelevant if we didn't (and we didnt) just get Valencia on loan.
3. He left his post, you make it sound like he slipped away in the middle of the night. Don't really remember the 'huge fanfare' either.
 

1. Well you're assuming again blah blah blah. An offer has been submitted, Barkley has rejected it. That's basically a fact. The rest is conjecture, I suppose, but I very much doubt the bigger teams are after him.
2. No he didn't say, your post heavily implied it though. Your point becomes irrelevant if we didn't (and we didnt) just get Valencia on loan.
3. He left his post, you make it sound like he slipped away in the middle of the night. Don't really remember the 'huge fanfare' either.
OK, I really don't know why you're still arguing but we'll agree to disagree.
 
OK, I really don't know why you're still arguing but we'll agree to disagree.

It's cos you jumped into a conversation between me and someone else and continued to make the same refuted points.

But yeah, let's agree to disagree.
 

Shrugged it off as coincidence then... Though yes there are other factors.

And well not really.

What better manager could we have got than Koeman?

We tried with Emery - who has struggled to adapt in France anyway - and he turned us down. Koeman was always our first and most realistic choice and he's been very good for us so far.

Koeman is also used to operating at clubs who use a DoF model. He's happy to set the style of player he wants and work at a club who have a 'long term' style set in place. This is just the start of that for us. I don't see where the issues are...

There are no issues, I genuinely don't know where that viewpoint comes from. It got to a point where the club had to do an interview with Koeman regarding Walsh to pipe everyone down for a few weeks.
 
£60M on Pickford and Klaassen.

Is there any point to this feller at all?

Where's the £5M and £7M type Leicester signings?
 


Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top