Why, if a new regime came in, would they proceed with it? Logistical nightmare, costs rising to a point where the club have to pledge their future earnings to make it happen, opposed by 41% of it's season ticket holders last August which probably means more like 60-70% opposition now....why on earth would a new owner pursue this madness? The only reason this lot are pursuing it is because the true owner of the club, Philip Green, fancies getting his nose in the trough of a retail development and forcing up the price of his own club shares in any future sell off. I'm sure now with the planning mess even he will be looking to jettison his shares when this thing comes officialy crashing down.
Hearsay. Unless you provide actual facts showing this stop.
This debate is getting silly now. People are still going over the same arguments just in different ways. I am getting really bored with both sides constantly going at it. Both sides provide info the contradict the others claims.
None of us really have access to all the info, so at best you are providing your opinion.
So lets keep it to what it is. Opinion. Lets stop speaking for other people or making your own numbers up.
Also, no more slandering of people (I am specifically thinking of Bradley, Wyness and Kenwright ie no more immature name calling) on this site. There are plenty of other sites willing to go down that road, so keep it on theirs.









