Eidean
Player Valuation: £8m
Al-Qaeda terror manual & Ricin
Where and how did he obtain them?
Probably downloaded it from the internet. It’s not a difficult manual to get.
Al-Qaeda terror manual & Ricin
Where and how did he obtain them?
Being charged with terrorism offences is not the same as a terrorist incident.Well that’s kind of the opposite to what happened here. This was a terrorist incident, but there has been a concerted effort to deny this.
Being charged with terrorism offences is not the same as a terrorist incident.
Latest info from Merseyside Police confirms this has NOT been declared a terrorist incident:
![]()
Statement from Chief Constable Serena Kennedy and partners following further charges for Axel Rudakubana
Chief Constable Chief Constable Serena Kennedy has today, Tuesday 29 October, made the following statement in relation to the case of Axel Muganwa Rudakubana:www.merseyside.police.uk
That doesn't mean it wasn't a terrorist incident of course. But by you declaring that it is you're effectively spreading misinformation, and that really hasn't proven to have been helpful throughout all of this.
Get your facts right lads.
I don't think this was a terrorist incident. My entire point is that the term is basically used a propaganda tool.Being charged with terrorism offences is not the same as a terrorist incident.
Latest info from Merseyside Police confirms this has NOT been declared a terrorist incident:
![]()
Statement from Chief Constable Serena Kennedy and partners following further charges for Axel Rudakubana
Chief Constable Chief Constable Serena Kennedy has today, Tuesday 29 October, made the following statement in relation to the case of Axel Muganwa Rudakubana:www.merseyside.police.uk
That doesn't mean it wasn't a terrorist incident of course. But by you declaring that it is you're effectively spreading misinformation, and that really hasn't proven to have been helpful throughout all of this.
Get your facts right lads.
To be factually correct, it’s analysis of a terror manual, believed to be by the US military.Al-Qaeda terror manual & Ricin
Where and how did he obtain them?
Mate, seriously, log off for a bit. You’re making a fool of yourself.Ahh the brainwashed puppy sniffer returns.
Such anti-white hatred oozing out of your little mind.
Being charged with terrorism offences is not the same as a terrorist incident.
Latest info from Merseyside Police confirms this has NOT been declared a terrorist incident:
![]()
Statement from Chief Constable Serena Kennedy and partners following further charges for Axel Rudakubana
Chief Constable Chief Constable Serena Kennedy has today, Tuesday 29 October, made the following statement in relation to the case of Axel Muganwa Rudakubana:www.merseyside.police.uk
That doesn't mean it wasn't a terrorist incident of course. But by you declaring that it is you're effectively spreading misinformation, and that really hasn't proven to have been helpful throughout all of this.
Get your facts right lads.
by proximity, they're making me stoopider.Mate, seriously, log off for a bit. You’re making a fool of yourself.
To be factually correct, it’s analysis of a terror manual, believed to be by the US military.
Government Agencies do not lie all the time. That would mean everything they said was a lie. Of course, they have lied, and on occasions in the future, will lie again but it’s a huge leap of bad faith to state (not even imply) that Government agencies “lie all the time”. There is a genuine question as to who can be relied upon for truthful news, especially as it breaks immediately these days. People simply believe what sits with their world view.You have to be really obtuse to not recognise this as a terror attack. The idea that the police and the CPS are the gatekeepers of truth, and that disagreeing with them makes you a purveyor of misinformation is actually really alarming.
Government agencies lie all the time. You’re really quite naive if you are relying on them to provide instructions on what’s true and what is not.
Government Agencies do not lie all the time. That would mean everything they said was a lie. Of course, they have lied, and on occasions in the future, will lie again but it’s a huge leap of bad faith to state (not even imply) that Government agencies “lie all the time”. There is a genuine question as to who can be relied upon for truthful news, especially as it breaks immediately these days. People simply believe what sits with their world view.
Okay, my words were slightly incorrect as I don’t believe that there is a government agency that only engages in nothing but lies.
However the question that you pose about who can be relied upon for truthful news definitely doesn’t exclude government agencies, and the idea that we can only rely on them for the truth is alarming.
Government agencies go to great lengths to suppress the truth, and this case is just one of many that demonstrates that.
Mate just face it, you've learnt something today - charged with terror offences isn't the same as a terrorist incident. You're just doubling down on your entrenched position, it's unnecessary and ill-informed.Okay, my words were slightly incorrect as I don’t believe that there is a government agency that only engages in nothing but lies.
However the question that you pose about who can be relied upon for truthful news definitely doesn’t exclude government agencies, and the idea that we can only rely on them for the truth is alarming.
Government agencies go to great lengths to suppress the truth, and this case is just one of many that demonstrates that.
Does it?
The truth has come out, hasn't it?
Isn't it best to the the police conduct their investigations before proclaiming anything?
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.