Spurs

[Daytripper]

Good luck to them, got nothing against Spurs

 

[YoboCopter]

Big sam never kept wba u
Conte wont win a trophy at spurs

All good things come to a end

 

[emir]

This is very similar to Liverpool hiring Klopp in 2015. It will be a slow burner but gradually Spurs will improve to the point where they'll be challenging for the title in 3-4 years. Conte will do a Juventus 2011 job on this Spurs squad imo.

 

[matty1878]

This is very similar to Liverpool hiring Klopp in 2015. It will be a slow burner but gradually Spurs will improve to the point where they'll be challenging for the title in 3-4 years. Conte will do a Juventus 2011 job on this Spurs squad imo.

and we continue to decline lol

 

[Rook]

This whole situation is a massive embarrassment for Spurs.
To give Nuno basically two months of football, having reached the League Cup quarter finals and being in the top half of the league is hardly a terrible start.
Or do Spurs think they should be top of the league?
Perhaps sacking Kane may have been a better option.

if you can get Conte but it means you have to put up w/ 2 months of Nuno its worth it IMO.

 

[TheBigIguana]

This is very similar to Liverpool hiring Klopp in 2015. It will be a slow burner but gradually Spurs will improve to the point where they'll be challenging for the title in 3-4 years. Conte will do a Juventus 2011 job on this Spurs squad imo.

He's gonna have to be as patient as Klopp

 

[Rook]

and we continue to decline lol

actually we don't really decline, we just hover around in various places inside the trapezoid.

I think we are currently in the nap phase

 

[Yarrgh]

actually we don't really decline, we just hover around in various places inside the trapezoid.

I think we are currently in the nap phase

Is that Benitez's motivational poster that he stuck up in the changies.

 

[matty1878]

actually we don't really decline, we just hover around in various places inside the trapezoid.

I think we are currently in the nap phase

lol lol lol

 

[Jamo Martinez]

Its a total nonsense of a comment whichever side its taken from.

On the one hand the clubs dont actually 'lose' any monetary capital of note without those fans watching on Sky etc and the 'loss' from fake rather original shirts would be miniscule.

If you flip it back to the direct contribution those fans have outside of the monetary aspect then clearly you have the added value to sponsors, global brand recognition and the marketing benefits amongst other things.

If you solely look at the comment from a business case then its nonsense.

If you solely look at the comment from a fan and 'love for the game' case then its also nonsense.

"Fans can only have a say if they pay money"

What if British citizens werent allowed to vote if they dont pay taxes?

The bit in bold was not what was being said. The point was about those contributing the least seem to be the ones who moan the loudest. Not about them not having a say if they don't pay.

Who do you think contributes more to a club?

a) people who pay to watch the match either at the ground or on tv and/or buy official merchandise.

or

b) people who do none of the above.

For the record, I'm in group b.

 

[Ray Purchase]

They are going to be up for it on Sunday.

 

[The binman chronicles]

They are going to be up for it on Sunday.

Best be doing something else at the weekend as this is not going to be pretty. I expect we will manage to look better than in our previous games with our players at last showing a bit of fight but Spurs will be on it x10.

 

[Ray Purchase]

Best be doing something else at the weekend as this is not going to be pretty. I expect we will manage to look better than in our previous games with our players at last showing a bit of fight but Spurs will be on it x10.

Sadly I am in the Lower Gwladys street.

 

[The binman chronicles]

Sadly I am in the Lower Gwladys street.

Perhaps you can swap with someone who is behind a post? Then tape your mobile to the aforementioned and put on the full 1985 semi final on you tube. Apart from the away supporters you'll be the happiest man in Goodison.

 

[Zatara]

The bit in bold was not what was being said. The point was about those contributing the least seem to be the ones who moan the loudest. Not about them not having a say if they don't pay.

Who do you think contributes more to a club?

a) people who pay to watch the match either at the ground or on tv and/or buy official merchandise.

or

b) people who do none of the above.

For the record, I'm in group b.

In terms of money? Lost me here...no idea of the relevance as per my post.