Sky

Status
Not open for further replies.
Aye - i could go to the pub. That'd be a 12 mile round trip in a car to the nearest dive showing sky to drink shandy fir an hour and a half. The pub would get cystom through it but Sky would still take their share. I simply refuse to fund them. The thing is the game, in all honesty I cant call it a sport anymore, isn't watchable to me anyway. I've streamed games and found them so tediously boring, compared to matches 25 years ago I switch off. The game has been ruined by money and I blame those who subscribe to sky.

I share the sentiments regarding the game to a large extent, I hardly missed it during the pause tbh, but blaming sky subscribers seems to be going a little too far to me. There are other sports as well as football which sky cover extremely well, and while I like football too, even if not as much as previous years, I'd rather be able to subscribe and watch lots of sports including football than have to stick to just extensive free to air wimbledon tennis or Olympic sports - neither of which I'm that interested in, but which is all the BBC seem to cover.
 
I share the sentiments regarding the game to a large extent, I hardly missed it tbh but blaming sky subscribers seems to be going a little too far to me. There are other sports as well as football which sky cover extremely well, and while I like football too, even if not as much as previous years, I'd rather be able to subscribe and watch lots of sports including football than have to stick to just extensive free to air wimbledon tennis or Olympic sports - neither of which I'm that interested in but which is all the BBC seem to cover.
Thats all the bbc can afford while people are throwing money at sky. If they didn't then the bbc would show a lot more sport free .

Imagine subscribing to channels absolutely rammed with adverts - actually paying for them!!
 
Thats all the bbc can afford while people are throwing money at sky. If they didn't then the bbc would show a lot more sport free .

Imagine subscribing to channels absolutely rammed with adverts - actually paying for them!!

I remember the way the BBC covered some sports, ok they're not a sports specialist channel and can't cover it nearly as well or in anything like the depth, but their cricket coverage was absolutely appalling, and that's being kind. Treating less favoured sports as dirt, while tennis sits on a pedestal, isn't a way forward and not something I'd want to go back to
 
If punting those 3 is part of a cost cutting exercise, realistically how much are they saving? I'd be very surprised if it's more than a hundred thousand a year on each of them. Can anyone see them spending billions on PL rights? The money in the game is going to dry up sooner rather than later.
 
I remember the way the BBC covered some sports, ok they're not a sports specialist channel and can't cover it nearly as well or in anything like the depth, but they're cricket coverage was absolutely appalling, and that's being kind. Treating less favoured sports as dirt, while tennis sits on a pedestal, isn't a way forward and not something I'd want to go back to
Cricket on the tv, commentary on the radio - the bliss of summers - until 2005. 15 years ago. I've never seen a single one if james Anderson's wickets or any of Straus' runs. Two top careers I’ve never seen. Think 9f the kids in the same boat who now grow up not following a sport they can't access. All down to greed.
 
Not everyone's cup of tea but I like Danny Gabbidon, doesn't feel the need to act like a bell to get attention and speaks his thoughts well.
They'll bring in some of the pundits that used to be at the stadiums around the place and replace those with recently retired players.
 
Cricket on the tv, commentary on the radio - the bliss of summers - until 2005. 15 years ago. I've never seen a single one if james Anderson's wickets or any of Straus' runs. Two top careers I’ve never seen. Think 9f the kids in the same boat who now grow up not following a sport they can't access. All down to greed.

I think these are two different issues, the total lack of live cricket on terrestrial TV isn't to be welcomed at all. For me I'd rather a channel that covered it properly in the past when given the chance, channel 4 or even channel 5 who took highlights when noone else bid, and was able to do it justice, rather than the bbc. I've just too many bad memories of their shocking and shoddy treatment. I totally agree though that it's massively missed.

However I wouldn't conflate that with greed at all, cricket absolutely needed the money, desperately so considering the parlous state of some of the counties. Sky stepped in offering a lifeline, the alternative was huge cost cutting with many counties going to the wall and jobs lost right left and centre. Cricketers even relatively top first class cricketers had to have jobs outside of the game in the summer months, only very recognised names made any money, and nothing like even other less well paid sports.

The BBC paid buttons for decades, having a monopoly on the rights, it thought it would always have them and invested nothing at all, relegated it to non coverage whenever any other sport was taking place, even trooping of the colour took precedence. It's actual coverage was absolutely abysmal with a fixed camera at just one end of the ground, so behind the keeper every other over, your view being totally obscured by the keeper, stumps and batsman, seeing how the ball behaved being absolutely impossible. The highlights were shown on the graveyard slot in the TV schedule, very late night or even early morning. In 2005 channel 4 made a counter offer and the TCCB couldn't get away fast enough. Channel 4 showed just how poor a job the BBC had been doing for years, it revolutionised coverage, analysis and actually invested in a few more cameras to cover it properly. Sky's offer came just in time as channel 4 could justify covering the ashes but not every series every summer against any non Aussie team. Their coverage just took it a stage further and improved matters again.

So while the need to get it back on terrestrial is very urgent and imperative, without Sky first class cricket might not even exist to the extent it does, it can't be just dismisses as greed, that's just simplistic and totally wrong imo.
 
I'm sure their production minions will be scouring through the reams of ex RS players to try and raise some sort of complete panel out of them. No doubt their sub-title editors in the gallery will be drooling at all the work coming their way as a necessity given the prospect of such precise and articulate ex-pros like Ian Rush, Jason McAteer and even Good Ould Aldo joining the gang.
Classic McAteer!
 
Cricket on the tv, commentary on the radio - the bliss of summers - until 2005. 15 years ago. I've never seen a single one if james Anderson's wickets or any of Straus' runs. Two top careers I’ve never seen. Think 9f the kids in the same boat who now grow up not following a sport they can't access. All down to greed.
100% agree. If a sport isn't readily accessible on tv for the kids, they'll never develop an interest. Some sports could just wither on the vine in they lose a generation.
 
100% agree. If a sport isn't readily accessible on tv for the kids, they'll never develop an interest. Some sports could just wither on the vine in they lose a generation.

Yes I agree on this too, but not at all the conclusion of it's all down to greed, that's just far too simplistic and just doesn't fit the 'case' history at all imo, it's far more complicated than that. However the need for some terrestrial coverage is very urgent indeed for precisely those reasons.
 
Cricket on the tv, commentary on the radio - the bliss of summers - until 2005. 15 years ago. I've never seen a single one if james Anderson's wickets or any of Straus' runs. Two top careers I’ve never seen. Think 9f the kids in the same boat who now grow up not following a sport they can't access. All down to greed.
Anderson and Broad were just getting going when I stopped watching. It's like a time warp to see them now as old hands. Stokes and Root are like complete strangers to me. Good players like.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top