First of all we got £1m for Cahill, but that's neither here nor there.
And I did raise issues about Pienaar's age mate. It concerns me and it's concerned a lot of people that we've spent £4.5m on a 30 year old. But it was necessity really. He was so integral to our play last year and in previous years that we really just had to do it.
Landon has never been integral to us because he's never been here long enough to be.
A good point indeed.
For me it's all about the fee. If LD is cheap, sign him up Molyez. If he's not, then sign someone else up ffs Moylez.
Why does everybody seem to fail to acknowledge the fact that we got 3m or whatever it was for Pienaar in spite of his contract being near its end? Then he signed new 4 yr contract & we got him back for 4.5m. That seems like all things considered some good business.
Likewise, LD was allowed to come 2 seasons in a row & defo helped turn our season around. Sorry but this is not your typical situation when u consider a star player during offseason, injury risks, etc. We may think MLS is playing hard a$$ but lets also show some perspective & christ forbid some grattitude. Finally, does anybody else think we could've received the fee MLS paid for Cahill on those wages with that much remaining on his contract? We all love Timmy but our friends in the US did us a bit of a favor on that as well, imho.
So...when we factor all of this into account, a few mil is more than fair & we'd b crazy not to jump on it (assuming it's an option). Long term there's value not only to improving exposure stateside but also in continuing positive relations with MLS as it continues to grow & provide both incoming/outgoing transfer opportunities.
That said, f**ckng do da damn thing already Lando/Moylez/MLS/Kenriches. FFS your giving us all headaches at this point.