After the the 1969 Cup final between Rangers and Celtic. I couldn't possibly comment.
![]()
And that was just the ballboys.........
After the the 1969 Cup final between Rangers and Celtic. I couldn't possibly comment.
![]()
Wasn't anyone on here I hopeI had a bit of a debate with someone earlier, over the merits of Michael Mols compared to Henrik Larsson.I'll say this much if it wasn't for that injury, then Michael Mols would have been spoken about, in the same breath as Larsson and Brian Laudrup.
Wasn't anyone on here I hope
Oh it's no joke.Pre that injury Michaels Mols was an awesome player.
!. Couldn't let Scottish football be missing from page one of World football for too long and
2. Would just like to say whilst trying my hardest to hold back a little bit, not in a million years was Michael Mols ever on the same footballing terms as Henrik Larsson, whom midway through his career had a double leg break and still peed all over Mols chips.
The only time Mols and Larsson would come up in conversation between you and one of your imaginary friends would be if Henrik wanted his boots cleaned by an ex Rangers player, whom would he possibly choose?
lollollolPoint 2 is just bitter and inane ramblings.In the grand scheme of things Larsson was the better player.But if Mols didn't suffer that injury, then things would have been different imo.

Larsson was a joy to watch as a neutral
The man was supremely talented
Don't remember him getting many tap ins, great finisher and always looked majestic, the Celtic fans must feel lucky that they managed to keep him for so long, I hope Seamus comes back from his injury as well as Henrik came back from his, they were equally as sickening.
That chip against Rangers in either 2000 or 2001
One of the best goals I've ever seen

Larsson was good.But i personally myself think that Brian Laudrup was better.
Larsson was good.But i personally myself think that Brian Laudrup was better.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.