Transfer Rumour Sandro Ramirez

[AndyC]

For pity sake...
Whilst there might be clauses, Atletico will not be in any way shape or form named as that would imply third party ownership of the player and that is illegal in the Premier League.

Now just chill and await the announcement is my suggestion

 

[Eggsyblueskin]

You would have thought we had learned a lesson after yesterday's faux outrage over an architects doodle. Can't we wait for the facts before casting judgement ?

 

[bluestevon]

If they wanted him from us, he wanted to go, I'm nearly 100% certain he'd go.

maybe so mate, honestly though it's just guesswork

 

[everton2004]

Farhad is absolutely loving this thread

 

[bluesb1970]

Sandro's clause is coming to town.

 

[The binman chronicles]

This transfer has had a lot of twists and turns on the rumour mill.

• From us wanting him
• to Atletico wanting him
• to us waiting on Atletico
• to get their ban
• to us signing him
• to him waiting for Atletico in Jan
• to it being 'done',
• to it going quiet for a week
• to it being 'done'
• to it only being done with some crap clause

What next I wonder?

 

[cromofo]

Welp, on to the next full hour.

 

[Yankfootball1]

And there we have it, instantly he has a 40m release clause cos somebody made it up.

I love the internet.

I am not saying he has a 40 Million release clause - just making a point that if there is a release clause or if there isn't why get worked up over something that you don't know the facts over. Ultimately if he helps Everton improve and possibly win a Trophy I am for it. Who know maybe he falls in love with Everton and sticks around. I am not going to beat the club up over signing a player that can help us improve if it means we have to insert a release clause to get him.

 

[scratchnsurf]

And there we have it, instantly he has a 40m release clause cos somebody made it up.

I love the internet.

You mean.......


It's not all true?

 

[ianefc]

For pity sake...
Whilst there might be clauses, Atletico will not be in any way shape or form named as that would imply third party ownership of the player and that is illegal in the Premier League.

Now just chill and await the announcement is my suggestion

But...But... I read it on Twitter.

 

[Goat]

SANDRO CLAUSE

 

[KevMirallas]

If a random Spanish twitter account told some of you your head was on fire, you'd dunk your face in the toilet.

Engage your brain ffs.

 

[ijjysmith]

maybe so mate, honestly though it's just guesswork

Discussing Everton and their utterly mad ways with transfers sometimes is defo guesswork.

If we win the league next year he'll stay.

 

[rochdaleblue]

Liverpool had a clause in Suarez contract mate, they just refused to honour it

Can you imagine a client of raiola not being able to exercise that clause? Still can't believe the RS got away with that and Henry publicly called out Arsenal over the bid.

 

[Blues Harp]

THERE IS NO SANDRO CLAUSE......Made up to keep the fume going...