didnt he?
“We have some young players who are very attractive in terms of their abilities like Vlasic and Lookman,” the manager said last week. “But they are so young and having to play them in the first team every single week – we have already been running with four players 23 and under – is for me a risky game in terms of results. Everton needs results until such time as it is certainly safe in the Premier League. If I try to then groom those players further there is over £2m a place. You need to still try and win. Grooming a youngster then becomes even more difficult because of the money.”
So on that basis, we need to climb 10 places in the league to pay for Theo Walcott. That should be a doddle

.
Or alternatively, we could just give Vlasic and Lookman more game time, develop them into better players than Theo has ever been, and trade the £20m we spent on Walcott for staying pretty much where we are in the league. Easy this football management.
In fairness, I'm not totally against Walcott. I think the squad will benefit from having him here as he's an upgrade on Lennon, Mirallas and probably Bolasie too. His pace and goalscoring will be most welcome.
Plus the lads Vlasic and Lookman are still only 20 and not ready to be starting week in week out in the premier. But what they do need is more game time, and at least one of them should be getting a minimum a 20 mins off the bench every game plus starting the odd game against the lesser teams (beginning with WBA at home this week). You just know it won't happen though.
And those comments from Allardyce?. Exactly the sort of thing I expected to hear from the guy when we appointed him. The longer he stays the further back we'll go with him.