Ross Barkley

Status
Not open for further replies.

And meanwhile let's tear him to pieces at every opportunity. He made his first mistake after 43 minutes in the Palace game, at which point large numbers of fans remembered why they were there and stood up to have a go at him.
Great fans we've got you know.

Fans are fickle beings. I for one hope he comes through and goes on to fulfil all his potential.
 

I think most Everton fans do. What annoys me more is people who somehow think Everton fans don't want Ross to succeed, that's strange...(n)
I hope people understand the difference between slating him (wrong) and him perhaps maybe potentially (hopefully not) not being good enough.

He may just be off form.
 
He's one of those players that you would be loaved to sell because there would always be the risk the penny would drop but in the meantime a player that would have you tearing your hair out.

Objectively speaking for other clubs when they have one like Barkley the penny very rarely drops.

loath to sell is the phrase you want

I personally dont really mind if he doesnt kick on too much, although hopefully he does. He is a toffee who wants to play for and help his team. when one of these managers and the responsible people above can actually get a decent squad together, lose the average players and buy a bloody playmaker we will see a decent Everton. Decent Everton means confident Everton and also means the dumb fans stop slating players at the game and booing. Good times basically.

Ross, playing at his current level or even at the level of 4 years ago would have plenty to offer that kind of Everton. At times a great sub option, at others first choice when in form and linking with a good solid team of good players.

What he isnt, is the confident and tough club man who will drag his team through crap spells and rise above the cry arses in the crowd.

Some fans dont care about having a blue play for the club. Some fans seem to be interested in what money we can get for a player, therefore bang on about sell him if a big offer comes in. Dont get that myself. I personally, and I think many other fans would be the same, LOVE having a toffee playing and sometimes playing excellently for the club. Having 20 or 30 or 40 or 50 million extra for the club to maybe possibly reinvest doesnt interest me in the slightest.
 
He's a luxury we indulged? He scored and laid on 16 goals last season and his emergence as a player casts very positive light on this club as he takes that profile international. His stats at this age compare very favourably with the best in his position at his age who have preceded him and those around now.

WT actual F is going on amongst some of our fans that they'd want to denigrate this lad? He's not the finished product, he's 23. He's easily our best player in terms of ability when he's on blob. Please just stop and think what your saying. Just because the Dutchman launches a public attack on him doesn't mean that we all have to fall into line and do so too.
It's because he's never on blob and we're still talking about performances he made years ago! Needs to improve right now.
 
It's because he's never on blob and we're still talking about performances he made years ago! Needs to improve right now.

I don't know why Barkley gets the brunt of the stick if we don't win. In the last three games we've failed to do so because a GK that would be warming the bench at any other PL looking to get into Europe has been woeful; players like Mirallas and Barry have been anonymous; and massive money signings more often than not disappear up their own arse with the ball.

Barkley is 23 and an established England player. We're having these conversations because the manager has chosen to make him in particular the focus of his criticism...why I don't know...although I suspect it's because he knows RB is a quiet lad and Koeman doesn't have the mettle to take on one of the senior pros to make an example out of.
 

I get the stick, I really do - but it's a problem with your view of the game rather than him.

Yes, he doesn't defend, he doesn't track runners well and at times he looks stationary - but that is his role. He's a playmaker.

Just like Lukaku, the fault largely lies with the rest of the team and how we set up to play. There's a break between midfield and attack because Lukaku is used as a target man and he can't do it, and Barkley is used as a box to box when he can't do it, so the two holding players (specifically when McCarthy played) were constantly too deep and the full backs simply don't bomb on as often as required, because they're conscious of being caught in behind if Lukaku loses the ball in advanced areas.

So the issue isn't the individual players; it's how we're telling those players to play. I give Lukaku a lot of stick for not adapting his game, so as said I really do understand why people look at Barkley and think he's not pulling a shift - but it really isn't their fault. If we'd have brought in the right players to play Koeman's game in the summer, we'd be a different proposition. As it stands, at least until January, we have to accept we have square pegs in round holes right now - Koeman inherited a horribly imbalanced squad from the balloon Martinez, and Gueye aside that hasn't been addressed, and it's no fault of his that it hasn't been.
 
I don't know why Barkley gets the brunt of the stick if we don't win. In the last three games we've failed to do so because a GK that would be warming the bench at any other PL looking to get into Europe has been woeful; players like Mirallas and Barry have been anonymous; and massive money signings more often than not disappear up their own arse with the ball.

Barkley is 23 and an established England player. We're having these conversations because the manager has chosen to make him in particular the focus of his criticism...why I don't know...although I suspect it's because he knows RB is a quiet lad and Koeman doesn't have the mettle to take on one of the senior pros to make an example out of.
In all fairness I've been making noises about Ross being under-par for a long long time. So koemans words didnt really affect mt opinion. However it's all down to the expectation level Ross himself gave us.

Ross is meant to be our main man behind lukaku, but he isn't showing what he can do imo. Not only that, it feels like a very very long time since he even showed us a glimpse of what he's capable of.
 
I don't know why Barkley gets the brunt of the stick if we don't win. In the last three games we've failed to do so because a GK that would be warming the bench at any other PL looking to get into Europe has been woeful; players like Mirallas and Barry have been anonymous; and massive money signings more often than not disappear up their own arse with the ball.

Barkley is 23 and an established England player. We're having these conversations because the manager has chosen to make him in particular the focus of his criticism...why I don't know...although I suspect it's because he knows RB is a quiet lad and Koeman doesn't have the mettle to take on one of the senior pros to make an example out of.
Yet another dig at Koeman. Barkley was getting stick way before Koeman was even here. So that's an inaccurate assessment.
 
He's a luxury we indulged? He scored and laid on 16 goals last season and his emergence as a player casts very positive light on this club as he takes that profile international. His stats at this age compare very favourably with the best in his position at his age who have preceded him and those around now.

WT actual F is going on amongst some of our fans that they'd want to denigrate this lad? He's not the finished product, he's 23. He's easily our best player in terms of ability when he's on blob. Please just stop and think what your saying. Just because the Dutchman launches a public attack on him doesn't mean that we all have to fall into line and do so too.
You said it yourself. The reason Martinez's team didn't work was because he wanted to push the fullbacks up and that left Barry and McCarthy with too much to do because Barkley and Lukaku don't like to defend. That makes them both a luxury.

This season it looked like Gueye had solved the problem but against half way decent sides it's too much.

However while Rom was one of the top scorers Barkley's offensive stats were only average for someone in his position.

In the end it meant Martinez having to play Cleverly on the "wing" to do his defensive duty meaning we could only play one winger.

And Koeman looks to be repeating the same mistake.

I want Barkley to be boss and go on to be amazing too but I want Everton to do well more and unless he improves defensively I just can't see both happening.

The only other option is to play Gueye and McCarthy but that means losing Barry.

If we just stop the fullbacks pushing on then it makes us impotent going forward.
 
I don't know why Barkley gets the brunt of the stick if we don't win. In the last three games we've failed to do so because a GK that would be warming the bench at any other PL looking to get into Europe has been woeful; players like Mirallas and Barry have been anonymous; and massive money signings more often than not disappear up their own arse with the ball.

Barkley is 23 and an established England player. We're having these conversations because the manager has chosen to make him in particular the focus of his criticism...why I don't know...although I suspect it's because he knows RB is a quiet lad and Koeman doesn't have the mettle to take on one of the senior pros to make an example out of.
Simply some of our Playstation fans want foreign signings who sign for big money.
A Wavertree lad who has worked himself into the first team for some reason doesn't come with the same kudos for some fans, so with that they use him as the proverbial sacrificial lamb
I reckon some of our players will be over the moon, as he mustvtakecsome of the pressure of them.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top