“I was not calm because we spoke a lot about about what happened at Chelsea,” he said.
“We spoke about how we need to start. We spoke about the opponent that they are in a difficult situation - from the start [we needed to] be aggressive, press, make it difficult so they are not comfortable on the pitch and it was not like that.
“I was angry because we know how we need to play but some players in the team it’s difficult to have that attitude maybe but okay the reaction in the second half we saw but not in the first half.”
“I expected a reaction from the start, not from the start of the second half. Of course in the second half we did good things – we played good football, won a lot of second balls with good pressing and we made it very difficult for them.
"That was a different attitude and what we expected from the start. But maybe a lack of confidence that we need. But I don’t understand why we needed to be one nil down to get that reaction.”
“When you play at home, we know if we play like the second half we will have the support of the fans,” he said.
“You can lose in football but it’s about how you lose the game. If you don’t press, if you don’t make it difficult, if you don’t run [and] go for it.”
“Maybe it’s better [to get angry before the game]. Of course I analyse myself - what I need to do so we make a good start at least at home. Maybe it was little lack of confidence after what happened against Chelsea and they had doubts. But if you have doubts on the pitch you are not yourself and you cannot be yourself for the team.”
The bold points are quite interesting. The more you hear him speak, he's saying the same things - pressing, aggression, attitude etc and the bit about some players having difficulty to have the attitude he wants suggests that he's thinking the same thing as the fans. Unfortunately he cannot do much about it until January/the summer.