So they are not accusing Attwell of bias but are merely concerned about the perception of bias that they themselves have entirely created. Tying themselves in Notts.
To summarise:
1st post = Knee jerk, egotistical, child-like response cooked up by megalomaniac ex referee who fled the continent, egged on by a volatile and doubt upset owner.
2nd post = massively transparent arse covering to the most embarrassing degree I have ever seen, written, double checked and proof read by 3 different partners in a law firm.
“No no no. We weren’t calling you corrupt. We know you aren’t corrupt. We love you. We were really worried someone else would call you corrupt if you made a purely accidental mistake, which we really know you never ever make, but we think you might have made 3 here and possibly deliberately. Not suggesting the club a ref supports makes any difference at all, but we thing the club a ref supports should be the defining factor on the games he/she is assigned.”
Not sure which post I love the most.