Fridge full of bear
Player Valuation: £50k
The lads at Barcelona tried their darnedestAppreciate the financial support he’s provided but has any team wasted as much money as us over the last 5 years - you’d be hard pressed to spend the money worse
The lads at Barcelona tried their darnedestAppreciate the financial support he’s provided but has any team wasted as much money as us over the last 5 years - you’d be hard pressed to spend the money worse
Then surely regular fans need to be charged a lot more than they currently are (among the lowest ticket prices in the league), which the club have said they're not going to do, or we need to sell a bloody lot more pie and ale to each fan on match days, or we need to magic a bloody lot of prawn sandwich folk out of the air.We had the option to choose a site where we could have had a far greater capacity and chose not to go with it because BMD was the superior location and a better choice for the club. Either way I don't think a lower capacity necessarily means far lower matchday revenue.
Match day has it has shown isn't the most important revenue, Commercial is where we make the jump, the biggest benefactors of that are City and PSG, to get ahead they used State owned companies to boost turnover. United showed the way how commercial revenues boost your turnover, the big clubs have caught up and are in a different stratosphere to us.Then surely regular fans need to be charged a lot more than they currently are (among the lowest ticket prices in the league), which the club have said they're not going to do, or we need to sell a bloody lot more pie and ale to each fan on match days, or we need to magic a bloody lot of prawn sandwich folk out of the air.
If we're wildly optimistic and say that after BMD we'll be earning similar match day revenue to Man City, this would see us go from £16 million per year to around £55 million per year. Or in other words, it would allow us to buy an extra Gylfi. While that's by no means a kick in the teeth, is it going to revolutionize our standing?
If we look at Spurs as another comparison. In their last season at White Hart Lane, they earned £45 million in gate receipts. This rose to £71 million while playing at Wembley, where they averaged some 65,000 fans per game. It's a tidy increase, but only enough to buy an extra Andre Gomes per year. It's likely that their new stadium will generate in excess of £100 million per year, which gives you an idea of what BMD has to produce in order for us just to stand still. Do we seriously think it will see us go from £16 million per year to over £100 million from a shade over 10,000 extra seats?
Then surely regular fans need to be charged a lot more than they currently are (among the lowest ticket prices in the league), which the club have said they're not going to do, or we need to sell a bloody lot more pie and ale to each fan on match days, or we need to magic a bloody lot of prawn sandwich folk out of the air.
We longed for a financial takeover after years of scrounging down the back of the sofa for transfer funds. In 2016 Moshiri arrived but 5 years on has it really been worth it? Possible new stadium aside I personally preferred the club pre-takeover when we had an identity, were smarter with cash etc.
Getting bummed off the RS 4-0 with players like Alcaraz, McGeady, Funes Mori and Niasse on the books?
Mistakes have been made but let's not pretend everything was rosy in the garden pre-Moshiri.
Oh he most definitely hasn't made us worse, but we've largely trodden water as the clubs that have traditionally been above us have gotten even richer.We would be in much worse shape had we not been bought out. We had no money to spend on players and lots of teams such as Villa, Leeds, Leicester and Wolves have closed the gap to us.
People like to throw blame in a single direction because it’s easier, but suggesting Moshiri has made us worse is plain wrong.
We would be in much worse shape had we not been bought out. We had no money to spend on players and lots of teams such as Villa, Leeds, Leicester and Wolves have closed the gap to us.
People like to throw blame in a single direction because it’s easier, but suggesting Moshiri has made us worse is plain wrong.
It wasn’t aimed at you. But there are a few who seem to believe that Moshiri has made us worse.My opening post wasn't blaming Moshiri himself; as an owner he's been brilliant in giving us money. I was more questioning us as a "takeover club" since he came.