That's an enormous assumption to make. It seems the State is in the enviable position of being right regardless of circumstances.
Diversity of opinion is just as important a facet of markets as diversity of choice as it fosters innovation. Where does innovation come from amidst the political classes when nearly all politicians today are career politicians?
I tend to approach political philosophy not so much from that angle as from the world of complexity. It seems everyone gets bogged down with looking solely at the political environment when that environment provides no evidence of any alternative ever having been tried. If you look elsewhere however the evidence for systems with a bottom up culture flourishing whereas those with a top down methodology floundering is overwhelming.
Diversity of opinion is just as important a facet of markets as diversity of choice as it fosters innovation. Where does innovation come from amidst the political classes when nearly all politicians today are career politicians?
I tend to approach political philosophy not so much from that angle as from the world of complexity. It seems everyone gets bogged down with looking solely at the political environment when that environment provides no evidence of any alternative ever having been tried. If you look elsewhere however the evidence for systems with a bottom up culture flourishing whereas those with a top down methodology floundering is overwhelming.