Don't talk about yourself like thatHow old is Buffon?

Don't talk about yourself like thatHow old is Buffon?

Colin Harvey would have never seen a blue shirt then left to you - he had a mediocre start playing the no 10 role - he became our white Pele ... he got a chance - that's the difference nowadays - loan deals are done in haste leaving some mediocre players in our line-up .. Arsenal played kids upfront in mid-week & romped home, changed it today lucky to get a draw .....

How old is Methusuleh?How old is Bergovic?
That posters not been about for agesHow old is Methusuleh?
He has had five games with Derby already even though he is only with them for a little over a month and had a change in manager to deal with.It’s great to see Armstrong doing well , and enough you’d hope to keep him the starting lineup when they lose some games and he doesn’t do so well. He’s capable of playing 6, 8 or 10 , it’ll depend I guess on where Derby see their strengths and weaknesses. It’s a super experience for an 18 year old who’s still age wise a 2nd Year Scholar .
It’s great to see Armstrong doing well , and enough you’d hope to keep him the starting lineup when they lose some games and he doesn’t do so well. He’s capable of playing 6, 8 or 10 , it’ll depend I guess on where Derby see their strengths and weaknesses. It’s a super experience for an 18 year old who’s still age wise a 2nd Year Scholar .
Make Begovic a player-coach, leave him off the bench, he can still do warm ups as a coach. I maintain, having a player on the bench that you definitely won't play serves no purpose.Ancelotti has now provided some explanation behind that, explaining how three shot-stoppers can be useful.
The boss told Sky Sports: "It's good to give Joao [Virginia] some matchday experience.
"It's also helpful I find to have two goalkeepers for the warm-ups. Above all, when we play away this also helps us avoid problems if there is an injury to the first or second option."
The greatest manager of his era disagrees with that.
Same logic for sticking a 17 year old on there, who also won't play.Make Begovic a player-coach, leave him off the bench, he can still do warm ups as a coach. I maintain, having a player on the bench that you definitely won't play serves no purpose.
Agreed, we need better players in the squad, so we have 9 options for changing a game. Defending having two keepers on the bench is a sideshow to the real issue. Since we don't have that currently, giving a young kid, who hopefully will play for us one day, a proper match day experience now and again seems more valuable than having a very experienced goalkeeper, who is definitely not playing, on the bench. But yeah, ideally one goalkeeper and eight outfield players who can actually contribute on the pitch should be the goal. No matter what Ancelotti says.Same logic for sticking a 17 year old on there, who also won't play.
You see, like Carlo, I can see the logic.Agreed, we need better players in the squad, so we have 9 options for changing a game. Defending having two keepers on the bench is a sideshow to the real issue. Since we don't have that currently, giving a young kid, who hopefully will play for us one day, a proper match day experience now and again seems more valuable than having a very experienced goalkeeper, who is definitely not playing, on the bench. But yeah, ideally one goalkeeper and eight outfield players who can actually contribute on the pitch should be the goal. No matter what Ancelotti says.
Yh. Ppl seem to forget it's only a few years ago we had 5 on the bench and 3 subs, then 7/3. Most of them won't get on, and the only one that is most irreplaceable if you end up with 2 injuries etc in the same position is GK, so I really don't mind it/see why ppl get such a bee in their bonnet about it. Also taking an extra youth player for the experience may often also mean them missing their own game, so debatable which is the more benficial there. Disgaree sure, but to see it constanly being brought up smacks of ppl just wanting to complain about something imo.You see, like Carlo, I can see the logic.
We don't need 9 subs on the bench when most games managers only make 3.
I know people won't agree and that's fine.
We all have our own views.
Link me to the games where a goalkeeper was injured/sent off, then the substituted goalkeeper was injured/sent off. I'm sure it has happened but I honestly can't remember a single occasion. In the days of 5 subs on the bench, quite a few managers would gamble on not having a keeper on the bench at all. Now it's apparently common sense to have 2/9 subs as GKs. Not for me, and most teams don't do it.Yh. Ppl seem to forget it's only a few years ago we had 5 on the bench and 3 subs, then 7/3. Most of them won't get on, and the only one that is most irreplaceable if you end up with 2 injuries etc in the same position is GK, so I really don't mind it/see why ppl get such a bee in their bonnet about it. Also taking an extra youth player for the experience may often also mean them missing their own game, so debatable which is the more benficial there. Disgaree sure, but to see it constanly being brought up smacks of ppl just wanting to complain about something imo.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.