No I'm not wrong. Sandro has looked awful since he got here.
Now don't get me wrong, I don't think he is awful and he will come good but it just goes to show what peoples perceptions of players can be after only a handful of games. If you had never seen Sigurdsson before other than one mad goal you would think he had never played football before so far on his showings for us.
Don't forget as well that Niasse came into a side where the atmosphere was toxic at the club, a lot of the players had seemingly downed tools already and he also had some personal issues to deal with.
I don't think he is particularly good, I also don't think he is anywhere as bad as some people make out. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle.
Well, TBF that's
your perception, as you've just said.
My perception of Sandro is that he's been off the pace and is trying too hard to impress, hence the tendency to try to let fly every time there is half an opportunity and drifting all over the place to try to get the ball. Not been great, but he does at least look like he's played football before.
Niasse was better at Hull than he was here (although he was still laughably bad at times), but there was a tiny part of me that wondered if we had been conned with Niasse in some sort of Ali Dia way after I saw his first couple of performances for us. He didn't really get any better either.
I'll accept the bit about the toxic atmosphere, but I judge on what I see. Sandro looks like a player who is off the pace, lacking in confidence and is trying too hard to impress - Niasse looked like a player who had never been coached how to play football. If he gets games this season, I'll judge him on those, but I struggle to see merit in the argument about how he "deserves" his chance