Niasse isn't a good footballer. He can score goals if a chance falls his way but the rest of the time it can be like playing with 10 men. He's a good poacher and is better suited to the high tempo football we have to play when we're chasing the game and he comes on as a sub.
That Crystal Palace match is probably the best he's looked starting a game but before he set the goal up he was looking crap and we weren't looking like scoring at the time.
The ball doesn't stick to him and we end up on the back foot. That's alright when we're throwing everything back at them on the counter at the end of the match because we've got nothing to lose at that point but playing him from the start handicaps us.
But isn't that the point? The ball isn't sticking with him so we should attack differently to play to his strengths? There is more than one way to play football and hoofing it to an isolated striker isn't the only way to do it.
We apparently have cms that can assist, we have wingers who can move the ball quickly, we have cms also that can cover a lot of ground to get forward.
Yet we play 2 holding midfielders and hoof it up the pitch and then wonder why balls aren't sticking. Watch United, they hoof it to lukaku and he has players to support him. We don't we didn't under koeman either. Yet we persist on doing this over and over! How about we attack in a way that only gives niasse the ball in the box? Or in space to run onto? Where his strengths are?
We play like every striker we have at the club is a world class 6 foot 5 centre forward with the strength of Hercules and when it fails because the team is always 39 yards away from him or he cannot run past an entire defence then we blame the striker every single time. People blamed lukaku for it, they blame lewen, niasse and soon tosun.