he said he was gonna do something that would blow her mind for valentines day.
Oscar Pistorius trial discussion
- Thread starter fozzy
- Start date
- Status
B
Big Fat Sam
Guest
toffeepie1878
Player Valuation: £8m
lol at this but yeh, why was she 'dating' this psycho in the first place, it can only be for his vast supply of african rand ffs.
he shot her when she told him she was leaving him, no doubt about it. Who else in a 'loving relationship' shoots 4 bullets into a jax on valentines nite without even seeing where his darling loving woman was.
* cries...I didn't mean it my love....waaaaaaaaaaaaaa, I never thought what i was doing..waaaaaaaa, I loved her my love.
or lord, whatever the hell.
he shot her when she told him she was leaving him, no doubt about it. Who else in a 'loving relationship' shoots 4 bullets into a jax on valentines nite without even seeing where his darling loving woman was.
* cries...I didn't mean it my love....waaaaaaaaaaaaaa, I never thought what i was doing..waaaaaaaa, I loved her my love.
or lord, whatever the hell.
Raymondo077
Player Valuation: £10m
He,s a whinging, lying, gun toting little prick.
That is all.
That is all.
Elong
The fire rises
This is pretty much why he is choosing his words carefully and saying things like "accident" and he didn't know what was happening. He'll take a manslaughter sentence if he can get one I think.
B
Big Fat Sam
Guest
Yeah but as above, he's claiming he did not intentionally
lol pull the trigger; rather that his gun mysteriously went off four times with a pause between the second and third shots, all simply because he heard a noise in the bathroom and didn't bother to check whether it was his girlfriend. Send him down.
Ashtonian
Banned on request
One thing i have not seen mentioned yet is the fairly obvious accusation.
If it was too dark to see where his GF was, how did he manage to get a fan from somewhere, get his legs on (apparently) find a gun, find the bathroom and fire 4 perfectly good shots into it without being able to visably make anyhting out right next to him?
If it was too dark to see where his GF was, how did he manage to get a fan from somewhere, get his legs on (apparently) find a gun, find the bathroom and fire 4 perfectly good shots into it without being able to visably make anyhting out right next to him?
B
Big Fat Sam
Guest
He wasn't thinking; apparently that gives you superpowers.
Foot Long Hot Dog
Player Valuation: A packet of pork scratchings
He's also not even admitting to when he fired the gun under the table in the restaurant, despite admitting to having it in his hands, it going off and expert testimony that it couldn't have gone off without the trigger being pulled by him.
This totally avoidance of accepting any responsibility for what was an obvious act of bravado inspired idiocy, should cast massive aspersions over his entire defence in the eyes of the judge and I fully expect Nel to major on it in his summing up.
B
Big Fat Sam
Guest
Who is this stupid div the defence have rolled out here?! lol
Had him giving all sorts of opinions and analysis on the sock 'used to kick the door', but has just admitted he only drew conclusions that it was his sock because he looked at a photo of the sock and it looked the same as the fibres found on the varnish of the door. lol
And Nel has just have him admit he isn't a blood spattering expert.
What a completely useless div!
God this fella is working me up with his answers, he won't give a straight answer to anything. Nel asks him "Did you ever have the sock in your hand?" and he answers like "I remember on the 15th of November I think it was the sock was in the lab", to Nel replies "You're not answering the question; did you ever have it in your hand?", then he goes a "No."
This 'expert' is making it up as he goes along! He isn't an expert in ballistics, blood spatters or forensic analysis, but the defence have used him as so.
Edit: He's a GEOLOGIST! Wtf! Haha!
Would you trust a geologist to handle a murder scene?
Had him giving all sorts of opinions and analysis on the sock 'used to kick the door', but has just admitted he only drew conclusions that it was his sock because he looked at a photo of the sock and it looked the same as the fibres found on the varnish of the door. lol
And Nel has just have him admit he isn't a blood spattering expert.
What a completely useless div!
God this fella is working me up with his answers, he won't give a straight answer to anything. Nel asks him "Did you ever have the sock in your hand?" and he answers like "I remember on the 15th of November I think it was the sock was in the lab", to Nel replies "You're not answering the question; did you ever have it in your hand?", then he goes a "No."
This 'expert' is making it up as he goes along! He isn't an expert in ballistics, blood spatters or forensic analysis, but the defence have used him as so.
Edit: He's a GEOLOGIST! Wtf! Haha!
Would you trust a geologist to handle a murder scene?
Last edited by a moderator:
- Status