In the event we did redevelop Goodison (which all though is definitely possible but probably won't happen), then I'd imagine we'd be at Wigan for however long it took. The pitch is terrible though.
This is one of the assumptions I was talking about when I posted the links on the last page. Re-development doesn't necessarily mean we have to move in the meantime. One figure I saw was that it could be done in a way that capacity wouldn't fall below 36,000. (This was just one of many different schemes though)
The space behind the main stand simply isn't big enough to create what we need, and that's before you factor in the practicalities of building in that limited space - without compulsory purchase of some of the housing directly behind it.This is one of the assumptions I was talking about when I posted the links on the last page. Re-development doesn't necessarily mean we have to move in the meantime. One figure I saw was that it could be done in a way that capacity wouldn't fall below 36,000. (This was just one of many different schemes though)
In an ideal world we could just wake up start of next season and walk up to a New Goodison like that.There have been alot of assumptions in this thread about what is and isn't possible with regards to re-developing Goodison. These documents are fairly old now but show some of the things that could be done from the point of view of professionals:
1) Trevor Skemptons comments back in 2007: http://toffeeweb.com/season/06-07/comment/fans/13407-Skempton.asp
- Note that he was responsible for the St James Park re-development.
2) One of various documents written by Tom Hughes in the aftermath of Kirkby. At the time he presented documents to show how you could redevelop 1, 2, 3 or all 4 stands. This is the 3 stand design: http://toffeeweb.com/club/goodison/Redeveloped_Goodison_Park.pdf
Note that neither of these documents show all of the possibilities. I have seen other suggestions from both of the above 2 authors which are not included here.
The space behind the main stand simply isn't big enough to create what we need, and that's before you factor in the practicalities of building in that limited space - without compulsory purchase of some of the housing directly behind it.
There's a world of difference between drawing up a plan that fits the current footprint and then transposing that into a scheme of works that is achievable.
Look at the space behind the RS's new stand and just how long that's taken them to achieve in terms of running down the area by buying up housing stock, and then LCC giving them the CPO's needed to complete the job.
I don't believe it would be better then Goodison though. I'm not saying it couldn't happen, just I cant see it. WHP would be a step down from Goodison location wise too."Imrpoving" doesn't just mean geography. If we can have a genuinely world class stadium in WHP or a slightly improved version of goodison, i'm voting for the former.
I admit that does seem the most far fetched of the various options presented in those docs - but the point is there are ALOT of options and many of them don't involve knocking down ANY houses and result in a huge increased capacity.Talk of Bridging Bullens road etc is just downright nonesense
I read it years ago, and it was fanciful then imo - and still is.You haven't read the docs have you? We don't need to knock down the main stand stand. We can just reconfigure it.
Don't agree, good pubs are a huge thing for a lot of us. I wouldn't drink in anything created by the club.It's less than a mile from Goodison.
It's mere existence would drive businesses that could feed of it to expand / arrive.
Choosing a location based on the number of alehouses in the vicinity isn't a prime factor.
The club should be looking to ensure that they retain a much higher percentage of our match day spend anyway, and instead of local pubs etc feeding off us, they should create an environment in a new facility that encouraged us to go there for a bevvy and something to eat instead.
I read it years ago, and it was fanciful then imo - and still is.