2025/26 Nathan Patterson


Should auld acquaintance be forgot,
And never brought to mind?
Should auld acquaintance be forgot,
And auld lang syne
1767281040095.webp
 
Defo a few RS whoppers in here, led by our clueless, twisted chum chuckie sweetnips.

Get back to rawk like I said @Charlie Sweet , your bile and hatred fit right in on that cesspool.

Please stop with personal attacks like this. It's rightly been reported.

Anyway. My comments stand that its unacceptable for a player of such standing - international in his prime being paid millions per year - is so out of shape.

Hopefully we get in a new RB asap
 

Please stop with personal attacks like this. It's rightly been reported.

Anyway. My comments stand that its unacceptable for a player of such standing - international in his prime being paid millions per year - is so out of shape.

Hopefully we get in a new RB asap
You would know all about personal attacks, your a disgrace in this thread and others, you rs wannabe wum.
 
You would know all about personal attacks, your a disgrace in this thread and others, you rs wannabe wum.
If you insist on continuing this vicious character assassination, could I request that you take it to dm? You're spoiling the enjoyment of the thread for those who come here to discuss the performance of Nathan Patterson and you're undoubtedly being a drain on his time of the volunteers who give up their free time to moderate this forum. It's New Year's Day for them too.
 
If you insist on continuing this vicious character assassination, could I request that you take it to dm? You're spoiling the enjoyment of the thread for those who come here to discuss the performance of Nathan Patterson and you're undoubtedly being a drain on his time of the volunteers who give up their free time to moderate this forum. It's New Year's Day for them too.
Yet you condone CS calling people pedos? Evidenced by your liking and laughing at comments when they do so.

Both of you need to look in a mirror sometime to get some self awareness.
 

Yet you condone CS calling people pedos? Evidenced by your liking and laughing at comments when they do so.

Both of you need to look in a mirror sometime.
Hello Marius, hope you're well and that you've had a good Christmas and New Year. I didn't condone anyone calling someone a paedophile.

I tend to avoid engaging with you on this thread, no offence but for many years now you seem to be far too invested in the argument and that doesn't make for a constructive conversation. And yet again, here you are making a post attacking members of the forum rather than debating the subject matter.

Nevertheless, I wish you well, and I hope you and your family have a happy, healthy and prosperous 2026.
 
Hello Marius, hope you're well and that you've had a good Christmas and New Year. I didn't condone anyone calling someone a paedophile.

I tend to avoid engaging with you on this thread, no offence but for many years now you seem to be far too invested in the argument and that doesn't make for a constructive conversation. And yet again, here you are making a post attacking members of the forum rather than debating the subject matter.

Nevertheless, I wish you well, and I hope you and your family have a happy, healthy and prosperous 2026.
IMG_7071.webp

So this is you not condoning the post that CS got a site ban for
 
Last edited:
Back on topic, the media didn't offer many favourable reports on his performance the other night:


🔥 A Mixed Night for Patterson Despite Team Win

Everton’s 2–0 victory at the City Ground was impressive as a result — especially given Forest’s dominance in possession (around 70%) and territorial pressure throughout the game — but Nathan Patterson’s contribution was not particularly convincing in a match where defensive solidity was at a premium.

Struggled to Influence Defensively

Operating at right-back, Patterson appeared to lack the defensive aggression and anticipation needed against a side that constantly probed down his flank. Forest’s persistent attacking forays forced Everton into defensive shape for long stretches, and while the centre-back pairing of Tarkowski and O’Brien were notably resilient, Patterson himself offered little assurance in 1v1 battles or in stepping up to cut out danger before it developed into pressure.
 
Back on topic, the media didn't offer many favourable reports on his performance the other night:


🔥 A Mixed Night for Patterson Despite Team Win

Everton’s 2–0 victory at the City Ground was impressive as a result — especially given Forest’s dominance in possession (around 70%) and territorial pressure throughout the game — but Nathan Patterson’s contribution was not particularly convincing in a match where defensive solidity was at a premium.

Struggled to Influence Defensively

Operating at right-back, Patterson appeared to lack the defensive aggression and anticipation needed against a side that constantly probed down his flank. Forest’s persistent attacking forays forced Everton into defensive shape for long stretches, and while the centre-back pairing of Tarkowski and O’Brien were notably resilient, Patterson himself offered little assurance in 1v1 battles or in stepping up to cut out danger before it developed into pressure.

Yeh chatGPT watched the game didn’t they.
 

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top