2021/22 Nathan Patterson

[BigDuncTributeBand]

Prob our best player first half, looks like there’s definite talent there. Unlucky we needed to change formation.

 

[Dixie1sixty]

A 5/10 performance.

He was hooked. Say no more.

Made up he played well as well because it has clearly got right on your mams.

 

[chrismpw]

Good debut. Going to be a good player.

 

[Curtis]

A 5/10 performance.

He was hooked. Say no more.

I thought he wasn't even adequate enough to start though Dave?

 

[EvertonGer]

I thought he wasn't even adequate enough to start though Dave?

What he knows about football you could write in the back of a postage stamp. Would take absolutely no notice.

 

[steven]

What I will say is …for the price…we had our pants down. Shouldn’t have been paying much for ‘potential’. Poor negotiations.

 

[maccavennie]

That was a very nice 45 minutes. Not afraid of the ball, confident and got pace.

 

[Dymak]

Looks a bit cack.

 

[Mr K.Dilkington]

Tripe and was subbed for it.

Couldn't even cross.

And here, we, go...

 

[Peacemaker]

What he knows about football you could write in the back of a postage stamp. Would take absolutely no notice.

I would like to add 'with a paintbrush'

 

[ForeverBlue92]

Got to give the bhoy time.

Bit worrying we spent the money we did on a player not yet trusted to play in a back 4 against Boreham Wood though.

 

[peteblue]

Crossing not great but the boy did well……

 

[Shibbywiggles]

Looked good but clearly behind Kenny in the pecking order so got hooked when we reverted to a four.
Can’t have any complaints either when Kenny put in a MOTM performance in the second half imo

 

[EFC_FRANCIS]

Not much you can take for 45 mins against a team 5 divisions below but what I will say is he is extremely one footed. Very worried how that translates up the levels as he didn't even threaten to use his left

 

[Parker]

Very tidy on the ball, confident, quick and a great frame for a full back.

Good debut