You cant have it both ways: he was either a 'dignified' man who served us loyally, or he was the hard-nosed operator who kept his club in the dark about going to United and strung us all out until Ferguson gave him the nod. Which is it, because the two characteristics dont sit easily with each other.
I've just said if he'd told everyone about United when it happened the pressure on the team to succeed would have been ramped up and the players would have known they wouldn't be playing for him next season which would have undermined his authority. Not to mention Sir Alex's, who still had a title to win ffs. Every interview question and all focus would be on next season when the one in hand hadn't even finished. If you can't see how that wouldn't have negative effects, I'm done. Also, he didn't keep us in the dark. He said we'd know at the end of the season. When his job was done. Sure, we didn't know he'd sign, but if he said he was signing, he'd have been lying. It's the only thing he could have done without blowing the whole thing wide open and risking both clubs' seasons.
Your argument seems to be here that the constant uncertainty over whether he was staying or going had a positive effect on the team?
I'm surprised you came to that conclusion. As stated above it was the best approach because it didn't undermine his authority and didn't mean he was making us think he would sign. If you think he should have come out and said he was off to United in the business end of a season, just for our peace of mind, you're being daft.
We were a car crash under Smith, but Moyes wasn't being specific about it was it really? His words were always to the effect that Everton have always struggled. Well we picked up a trophy seven years before he arrived and when he left 11 yars later it was still the last one we won. I find that 'utter sh*te' to be honest.
Moyes brought the club to the top 6/7 in his first 14 months at the club and kept it there for the best part of a decade with a tiny budget. He doesn't have to act like that wasn't a great achievement because you don't like him.
For someone who asks for 'shreds of evidence' supporting the case Moyes made the bid, you're pretty fast and loose with the claims he didn't. Why on earth d you think Moyes wouldn't be central to this whole bidding process? He's valued players before at Everton - this we know. He'd walk away from a player costing what he thought too much and tell any predator that they were being 'ridiculous' to come in cheap for one of ours. Do you think he turned to Elstone to do all that for him or BK? You are being way too generous in your view this feller has had little hands on activity with this low bid for his ex-player.
Again, he's not deciding the price any more. Bill is. His valuation doesn't matter. His club is looking to get the best deal possible. Obviously. Sure, £12m may be a ridiculous offer, but hey, Bill's a ridiculous chairman and one last time: Moyes isn't the one who decided player values here any more. He may have a view over negotiations but don't you think Manchester United may be able to employ people who could possibly hash out a deal better than David Moyes?
And why d'you keep saying 'little old Everton' and 'plucky little Everton'? It sounds like you believe we cant ask for a decent price for our best player and the best LB in Britain without sounding sorry for ourselves...which is ridiculous.
Because we're effectively asking MANCHESTER UNITED'S MANAGER to bid higher than he needs to for our player just because he used to manage our team. If we do that we live right up to those tags. 100%. It's pathetic.