B
best little spaniard
Guest
I'd rather have Osman. And so would all you if his name was Osmonio and had European flair ;
![]()
Brilliant

I'd rather have Osman. And so would all you if his name was Osmonio and had European flair ;
![]()

I'd rather have Osman. And so would all you if his name was Osmonio and had European flair ;
![]()
The one who didn't turn up at Lisbon?
Over the Moutinho who turned up at Goodison, yes.

Unfair to judge base on one or two matches. On the whole, Moutinho seems to be the younger, fitter, better version of Osman. The
most important part is Moutinho can play anywhere across midfield and be effective, Osman can't.
I wonder what's their goal assist ratio comparison.
Is he signing yet?

'Seems' being the key word.
Seemingly better than Osman doesn't warrant a record breaking transfer of £18m/£22m, does it?
Also disagree with Moutinho being effective 'anywhere across midfield'. On the wings, definitely not - defensive mid? Very much doubt it in the Prem.
Is this whats it become? Young Jack is heartbroken, the bashing you have given him the last few months. And now your starting on players before we sign them to greatness, shocking.
The Mout is the type of player that can play anywhere and shine. Every inch of his "compact" frame is built for footballing pleasure.
Is this whats it become? Young Jack is heartbroken, the bashing you have given him the last few months. And now your starting on players before we sign them to greatness, shocking.
The Mout is the type of player that can play anywhere and shine. Every inch of his "compact" frame is built for footballing pleasure.
'Seems' being the key word.
Seemingly better than Osman doesn't warrant a record breaking transfer of £18m/£22m, does it?
Also disagree with Moutinho being effective 'anywhere across midfield'. On the wings, definitely not - defensive mid? Very much doubt it in the Prem.
Toxteth, the common opinion on Moutinho is that he is a box to box.
Personally I think he's a midfield that can play with equal effectiveness in the middle of the park with any sort of mission.
Tell him to be a box to box and he will. Tell him to be the anchorman and he will. Tell him to play the number 10 position and he will.
Last match you could watch part of what he can do. When he was told to roam he caused problems and made Osman to man mark him. When Sporting needed to defend and explore the counter you saw him with a knife in his teeth chasing opponents and the ball.
I don't think he would compete with Arteta for a place, I think he would add value to Arteta's style of play.
Arteta wants to go up... Moutinho will provide cover for him. Arteta wants to sit...Moutinho will do the running up and down the pitch. You want someone to help your full back? Moutinho will do it.
I never said Arteta couldn't defend (asking if he will provide cover doesn't mean necessarly he can't defend) I said that Moutinho will do it better because he is a smart player with very good perception of the game, with a great engine and energy.
The picture of Arteta that I have tells me he's a clever player who likes to have the ball, with very good offense ability but not all that hardworking. He prefers to control his position than close down on the opponent. Will he read the game to go for the rescue of his fullback? Not saying he won't, but the hand full of matches where I watched him never showed this in his game. Sometimes he lets himself in the shadow of the game (even in his best days). I remember him operating on the wing and I remember we discussed Arteta's best position. I told at the time that I'd put him in the middle in a 3 man midfield or on the left wing like Pienaar is used.
Clearly you know Arteta a lot better than I do, but I do know Moutinho a lot better than you do so we may be talking rubbish comparing them both.
As I said Moutinho could well be a similar player to Scholes. Even the goals in Scholes game could be replicated in Moutinho's, given the time and the hard work in training.