Gladystweet
Player Valuation: £50m
Oh I do it all the time...known for it I am. Can't help me self.being what?
Oh I do it all the time...known for it I am. Can't help me self.being what?
Bloody Sunday wasnt a war crime, it was merely self defence.
obstreperous, mate. Ya thick or what? No idea what it means either.being what?
If not, it was certainly close to one.
It was fueled by retribution rather than strategy. Which is a pretty dark way to kill 20 thousand civilians.
"I ... assume that the view under consideration is something like this: no doubt in the past we were justified in attacking German cities. But to do so was always repugnant and now that the Germans are beaten anyway we can properly abstain from proceeding with these attacks. This is a doctrine to which I could never subscribe. Attacks on cities like any other act of war are intolerable unless they are strategically justified. But they are strategically justified in so far as they tend to shorten the war and preserve the lives of Allied soldiers. To my mind we have absolutely no right to give them up unless it is certain that they will not have this effect. I do not personally regard the whole of the remaining cities of Germany as worth the bones of one British Grenadier.
The feeling, such as there is, over Dresden, could be easily explained by any psychiatrist. It is connected with German bands and Dresden shepherdesses. Actually Dresden was a mass of munitions works, an intact government centre, and a key transportation point to the East. It is now none of these things."
Not officially, but the victors are very rarely accused of such things I'm afraid.
Dresden had very little strategic value, yet was decimated. I think it was a war crime. Indeed, it was the sole unjustified action from British forces I can think of in that war - everything else at least had a logic behind it when set against what it was trying to achieve or at the very least a just cause for retaliation. Or in the case of British rape of German civilians in 1944/45, it's a very unfortunate thing that happens with every invading army to a new territory, so it isn't unique to Britain.
There were many of these types of bombings, not just Dresden... Unfortunately it had to be done though
yesobstreperous, mate. Ya thick or what? No idea what it means either.
It wasn't, though. The RAF had spent the last two years conducting what were essentially area bombing raids (which were all that Bomber Command as a whole could realistically achieve, though individual squadrons were capable of precision attacks) on German cities, killing more people before (at Hamburg in 1943) and almost as many after (the Pforzheim raid of February 1945) in attacks that receive nowhere near the criticism that Dresden did. As Harris said (from the Wikipedia page on the raid):
It wasn't, though. The RAF had spent the last two years conducting what were essentially area bombing raids (which were all that Bomber Command as a whole could realistically achieve, though individual squadrons were capable of precision attacks) on German cities, killing more people before (at Hamburg in 1943) and almost as many after (the Pforzheim raid of February 1945) in attacks that receive nowhere near the criticism that Dresden did. As Harris said (from the Wikipedia page on the raid):
I would say the whole of that war.The battle of the somme
just that moment, asking hundreds of the british army to walk accross no mans land in the eye of a machine gun.I would say the whole of that war.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.