I honestly think he would work really well with DCL up top. Like REALLY well. He's not a target man, he's a poacher.
But then that leaves Richarlison out and that doesn't work.
But then that leaves Richarlison out and that doesn't work.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I don't think that's a remotely controversial view to be honest. A year ago everybody would have said Kean was the most talented of the three, he was meant to be a global superstar. It's hardly backing the outsider when you're saying a £27m full Italian international bought from Juventus might be more talented than a £1.5m buy from Sheffield United. I've said before, Kean is clearly talented; it's not a case of not being able to recognise that, it's just a case of weighing up whether he is going to produce enough during his time with us. Hopefully the answer is yes, and if he keeps scoring then nobody will even be asking the question.
I don't think Ancelotti currently sees him as an option to play up front in competitive games, which is a real problem. I might be wrong, but the fact is he's only started 3 times in our last 19 games, and in a game last night where every other possible outfield starter was rotated, we decided to keep the 2 strikers in rather than give him a go. I also thought it was telling that he was brought on literally as soon as we had a 2 goal cushion, as if even bringing him on when one up was too much of a gamble. We can say we don't know because we don't work for the club, but i'd be pretty confident in saying that wasn't the expectation when we signed him and made a massive fuss about it.
I think you're looking at the price thing quite simplistically. Yes they're just players, but we don't have infinite resources, so how much players cost is relevant, because it affects what we can do elsewhere in the squad. If Kean had cost £500k from Ascoli and was being paid £10k a week then we'd have £26.5m and £40/50k a week to put towards a new keeper/centre half/right back etc, so it's a bit silly to say it doesn't matter truth be told.
I tend to agree he needs a run in the team and not sure Ancelotti has confidence in him at all. Maybe a loan is the best option give him game time elsewhere to see if he does step up.Fourth striker? Have they told him that? I be very disappointed if he left. He hasn't started anywhere near as well as we hoped, but just looking at him
he could be anything one day.
Was thinking this myself. People took off on here because we never played lookman and said we wer making a mistake selling him. 12 months on who is lookman? Looks very good business now. I'd love Kean to succeed but at the moment he is nowhere good enough. I get that he is young but for me his body language says that he doesn't want to be here rather be back in Italy. If we do a loan it must be an obligation to buyReminds me a bit of the Lookman situation.
It doesn't make a lot of sense this. Why go back to be (at best) 4th choice? Why would we be willng to let him go for £20m? What might be a "creative solution". Surely it is just pay the money or move on.
My own theory, is that Raoila wants to move him on. We are open to it, but at a certain price point and he is struggling to get that agreeent.
That being said, I know we looked at Kulusevski previously, I wonder if this talk may re-emerge as an option?
I hope we keep Kean, but Milik on a heavily cut price deal might be a good compromise.
Juventus FC - Club profile
All information about Juventus (Serie A) ➤ current squad with market values ➤ transfers ➤ rumours ➤ player stats ➤ fixtures ➤ newswww.transfermarkt.com
Szczesny
De Ligt
Demiral
Arthur
Bentacur
Kulusevski
Dybala
I guess those are the ones we would want in any swap deal.
None seem likely
A sell on clause like the one we point blank refused them last year?Add in a sell on clause too if the Juve news is true. If he sells to PSG for 80 mill in 4 years then I want some of that.