I welcome your opinion.. however unlike simms, calvert lewin, holgate.. beckham?, kean was brought in for almost 30 million quid and i do not believe for one second he was brought as a "prospect" that may or may not make it. He was brought in to hit the ground running and improve us. Has the done that so far? If we brought a forward in for ten million, on a one year deal and he wasnt producing, getting subbed as a sub and generally not looking that promising.. we would all be questioning with they were brought in and would be wanting them out the club asap - eg. niasse.
Id love him to be a success as it would mean as an entire team we would have more success. For all we know these statements from carlo could be to force the hand of a prospective buyer or he could well feature more this season.. we simply do not know. But one thing is for certain he wasnt brought in to play bit parts and cameos - so for that to be the case so far suggests hes not trusted to do a job at this point in his career.
Maybe, maybe not.
He wasn't getting regular starts at Juventus so I think it may have been foolhardy if he was brought in with the assumption that he would immediately adapt to English football and lead the line. He may well have been bought with the idea that at current market rates £30M really isn't that big a price for a player widely touted as one of the most promising prospects around and even if it takes a year or two that will look like pigeon feed compared to what he could be worth.
Wolves have just dropped £35M, a club record, on Fabio Silva. He's 18 years old and has managed 1 goal in 18 senior appearances for Porto. Personally, I don't think they're expecting him to hit the ground running and play like Raul Jiminez.
Potential costs a lot these days. The transfer fee doesn't always translate strictly to immediate fireworks expected.