arminisgod
Player Valuation: £35m
Feel free to google, but regarding the "study of nude boys" (NOT necessarily the same as pornography, but decidedly weird): https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jackson-jury-sees-nude-boy-books/
No answers to the two questions though? Without going all socrates and just answering with another question...
Worth noting that being able to replicate markings with considerable accuracy is far more compelling evidence than a binary yes/no to circumcision.
Jordan denied that he ever saw Jackson's body but said he did lift his shirt once to show him the blotches on his skin.[6]Investigators made a probe into Jackson's history, including family interviews, to see if he had undergone procedures to alter his body's appearance, as the grand jury felt there was no clear match with Jordan's description.[61]
how can I answer them? Both your questions have no facts behind them what so ever. Are you going to ignore the circumsised bit? or that the S & M bondage thing hasn't ever appeared on and list of things found by the police?









