I have. My opinion still stands.
Thats fine. No one can say for sure but for me it's simply a case of whats more believable.
Michael Jackson fits the textbook profile of a paedo. He had an abused childhood, has an obsession with youth, spent all his time hanging around with kids, slept in beds with kids hundreds of times, bought wedding rings for his 'special kids' etc... that's just a few things off top of my head.
I find it a lot easier to believe he was a paedo than i do this all being a conspiracy by two families to make money. The two families had never met prior to the filming and weren't legally allowed to do so either due to ongoing court stuff and yet the two guys testimonies were strikingly similar in terms of how they were groomed etc. The level of effort required to get two entire families to collude with each other and lie convincingly on camera would be immense, they'd have to take acting classes, concoct bullet proof stories which they know would be analysed to death by those doubting them. I just can't buy into that, seems much more likely that the guy who did lots of weird noncey type stuff was in-fact a nonce.