orly
Please check with me for Blammo criteria
They've been a bit quieter the last month or so though haven't they?
Smarter people (like me) knew the real deal

They've been a bit quieter the last month or so though haven't they?
Has the poll result changed when no-one was looking ?
Internet polls are inaccurate
Thats because no ones arsed to change itThe poll's said consistently out since March so it's not "back out"
Think we should have a poll on that.I'm talking about in regards to the number of posts in here. The gap in the poll has closed and I'm pretty sure @chicoazul did a poll which showed the majority wanted him in? And you know why? This poll was started after arguably our worst result/performance of the season. Chico's was started when we were winning games.
Internet polls are inaccurate.
581 outThats because no ones arsed to change it
NEA hes staying for at least another 6 months so the plotters can stamp there feet all they want, i just Lol581 out
461 in
That's the bottom line...
How many voted in the poll you like (which didn't have a change vote option) compared to this and did the same posters vote in each ?So both this poll and Chico's polls are accurate? Makes sense...
How many voted in the poll you like (which didn't have a change vote option) compared to this and did the same posters vote in each ?
Is there not an argument that although we beat the mighty burnnley with 10-men it wasn't all that good of a performance? And despite victory changes were warranted. No one deserved to be dropped from last week, no one.