tim cahill
Player Valuation: £50m
I think that article just suggested that everton are abusing the financial fair play rules...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
roflwenger
We are just bridging a gap between stable and the obscenely wealthy. Not sure what else we are supposed to do apart from spend ourselves into bankruptcy to compete in a league where there's a huge financial vacuum at the top. Lets not address that problem though, lets attack a club performing well despite the enormous difference in resources.
I know mate. I read it.He did mate
Loan Wolf
Martin Samuel uses the majority of his Daily Mail column on Wednesday to rail against a loan system that has allowed Everton to bring Romelu Lukaku, Gareth Barry and Gerard Deulofeu, under the headline 'Everton fairytale has us hooked - shame it's built on £50m loan sham'.
To begin with, Samuel compares Everton's loans to the welfare state and open-door immigration, something Mediawatch thinks is such a surefire way to get Mail readers onside that we're surprised it isn't compulsory in all articles.
'What would Lukaku cost Everton? Let's say upwards of £25m,' writes Samuel.
'Deulofeu is a rising star in the Barcelona academy who has represented Spain at every level from Under 16 through Under 21, and was voted the Golden Player at the UEFA Under 19 European Championship. He wouldn't come cheap.
'Then there is Barry, a squad player at Manchester City and now 33, but even so he might have commanded £6m as a permanent transfer in the summer. Total: somewhere north of £50m, maybe as much as £60m.'
There is certainly an argument to be had regarding the fairness of the current loan rules in terms of avoiding FFP measures, but we can't help feeling that Samuel's view rather gets lost in the necessity to hoover up the clicks, hence making it a fairly personal attack on Everton.
There is no mention of Sunderland's five loans this season. Or Fulham's five. Or West Ham's four. Or Hull's three. Or Stoke's three. Or Aston Villa's two. Or Newcastle's two. We could go on. Presumably Samuel's rule is that loans are fine as long as those players don't turn out to be any good.
Mediawatch doesn't remember West Brom's climb to eighth last season being labelled as a sham with Lukaku at their club, nor United's two Premier League titles achieved when Carlos Tevez was on his two-year loan from West Ham, or Christophe Dugarry and Jurgen Klinsmann helping Birmingham and Spurs survive relegation struggles.
The loan rule could well be altered, although we don't actually see any issue when the rules are the same for all, but to turn that into an undermining of Everton's achievements this season seems pretty cheap.
Me too, but a little bit of me is somehow half expecting some 'crucial' refereeing decisions as we get down to the wire........