Marriner

[Ashtonian]

an unbias view of the reds.

Mangala just randomly kicking when jumping for the ball. It was clumsy and stupid BUT i wouldnt say red. No violent conduct as such, just petty.

Fernando however foot high, studs out and ball head height, that should have been one all day long. If barry had done that he would have been off no question about it.

 

[OneTrueLegend]

I think Mangala should have been off, Ruud Gullit even said it on MOTD, he had no intention of getting the ball, he has tried to hurt Eto'o. The Fernando one deserved a red as well.

I can only think Barkley was carded for a "dive" because he was accused of it previously, total joke, Lampard knew exactly what he was doing, ran across Barkley and knocked him over.

The pen was laughable as well, I seriously hope the club put in a complaint about Mariner, he was poor.

 

[johnnyW]

You seriously think they were stonewall reds? If it was given against us we'd be fuming like, especially the Fernando one. As I said, I think I would have given yellows, although the Mangala one I would have seriously considered, as that was bad like.

Having anything to do with Chelsea? C'mon guys, get a grip, bullied by the home crowd is certainly plausible, but because Chelsea lost? This isn't some conspiracy..

both of them where absolutely stone wall reds. A flying kick to the kidney and a high foot to the face. Both of them where not in control of them self's, both where reckless and dangerous. If it was the other way round he wouldn't of thought twice about it. This should of totted up to 6 players in the last few weeks that should of been sent off against us and only one has.

We really are to nice to the ref's.

also football is corrupt we all know this if you think that italy is the only leauge with that issue then I would like you to look at last season and the disgrace that was the ref's then.

fact football is a business now a days and like all businesses it's all about money. this year has been crap with big teams not delivering, smaller teams climbing high, Chelsea running away with the leauge. its been boring(there is a little part of me that is happy for the little teams btw) nobody cares about wham vs Swansea but that is 3rd vs 6th atm, that won't get viewers, that won't get the money flowing in.

so when chelsea finally screw up and a chance to make the leauge a little bit more interesting you can't tell me there not going to take that chance. The FA aren't going to give a crap about a ref having a suposed nightmare of a game last season proves that. especially now no one a can really question the ref afterwards or they will get fined and a ban

 

[Tubey]

Completely unbiased, simply looking at the rulebook, and they are, without question, absolute stonewall red cards. It comes under the bracket of serious foul play in terms of being a very dangerous tackle. The one at waist height is a red as it's an unnatural attempt to win the ball (you can jump without a straight kicking angle whilst doing so) and the one to the head is simply obvious.

There's no debate to be had in regards to whether they were reds; the debate is to how Marriner is so incompetent to the point where he apparently saw the incidents but didn't apply the rules.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...tting-referees-benevolent-Andre-Marriner.html

 

[neil999]

Completely unbiased, simply looking at the rulebook, and they are, without question, absolute stonewall red cards. It comes under the bracket of serious foul play in terms of being a very dangerous tackle. The one at waist height is a red as it's an unnatural attempt to win the ball (you can jump without a straight kicking angle whilst doing so) and the one to the head is simply obvious.

There's no debate to be had in regards to whether they were reds; the debate is to how Marriner is so incompetent to the point where he apparently saw the incidents but didn't apply the rules.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...tting-referees-benevolent-Andre-Marriner.html

i dont think he saw the mangala one but gave a yellow 'just in case' cos of players reactions...which is the worst kind of reffering..

 

[Tubey]

I'm rapidly losing interest in football because I am becoming convinced it's scripted. Marriner (and others) CAN'T be that bad to have reached the level he has - what they can be is BOUGHT OFF. Where SKY try to engineer a more exciting league so they can sell more games.

There's no doubt in my mind there's more than a few officials in the game right now who are outright corrupt. It'll come out in the wash one day.

 

[DanEFC92]

i dont think he saw the mangala one but gave a yellow 'just in case' cos of players reactions...which is the worst kind of reffering..

He guessed with the penalty incident too.

 

[Tubey]

i dont think he saw the mangala one but gave a yellow 'just in case' cos of players reactions...which is the worst kind of reffering..

Then he's incompetent either way, not fit to do the job and should be sacked.

What I don't understand about the FA is why these idiots are allowed to make 'mistakes' of this nature all the time and nothing whatsoever happens to them for it.

 

[neil999]

He guessed with the penalty incident too.

and the barkley yellow! lol gave the penalty on milner being a 'decent chap who doesnt dive'

 

[Minimeister]

There's no doubt in my mind there's more than a few officials in the game right now who are outright corrupt. It'll come out in the wash one day.

Whether it was the deciding factor in the game or not, had that been Lukaku in the box and not Milner there's no way in the world Marriner would have given a penalty. It wasn't far off that decision Moss gave last season against Coleman which was an equally corrupt decision.

 

[Blue Parkender]

The man is a clown not fit to ref a Sunday League game, never mind the prem.

 

[Springhettios]

So do we know if the club will file a complaint?

 

[tim cahill]

Completely unbiased, simply looking at the rulebook, and they are, without question, absolute stonewall red cards. It comes under the bracket of serious foul play in terms of being a very dangerous tackle. The one at waist height is a red as it's an unnatural attempt to win the ball (you can jump without a straight kicking angle whilst doing so) and the one to the head is simply obvious.

There's no debate to be had in regards to whether they were reds; the debate is to how Marriner is so incompetent to the point where he apparently saw the incidents but didn't apply the rules.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...tting-referees-benevolent-Andre-Marriner.html

Sounds like graham poll didn't agree with any of the big decisions that went against us.

 

[Professor Toffee]

So do we know if the club will file a complaint?

If they don't file a complaint I think they're making fools of themselves

 

[Professor Toffee]

Whether it was the deciding factor in the game or not, had that been Lukaku in the box and not Milner there's no way in the world Marriner would have given a penalty. It wasn't far off that decision Moss gave last season against Coleman which was an equally corrupt decision.

Had Roberto complained about the display thus bugger gave yesterday?

You could imaging how the likes of Fergudon's or Wenger would react.

Or even Brent.....he had plenty to say about a dodgy ref after the RS were beaten at City last season.

absolutely, let's start making noise about the appalling decisions made against us
Mariner cost us the match.
No pen, two reds.
That point or points will be important at the end of the season one way or the other.
Let's stop being nice ffs, this ref is a disgrace on every level.
Let's say it and ask for an investigation into his performance
Or have one ourselves!