I hear Coleman is still missing from before that first goal tbf.Nah playing Coleman at left back was
Wanted away to play every week, can't blame him.Virginia looked a much better back up.
He's second choice at Sporting, he's just played the last 2 games because their first choice got injured.Wanted away to play every week, can't blame him.
As many as he played for us last season? Bit warmer on the bench there too.He's second choice at Sporting, he's just played the last 2 games because their first choice got injured.

No. People are just looking for reasons to wind themselves up.Was he that bad yesterday?
Didn't think he did anything worthy of persecution. Or are people saying that he was at fault for both goals? And how?
Confused
First goal was a great reaction save. Keane caught ball watching for the initial ball in behind and then flinched at the rebound, making himself as small as possible. Tarkowski nowhere to be seenNo. People are just looking for reasons to wind themselves up.
He was fine. Pickford would've been a better choice but he's one of the best around.
Pickford would have done better with both. The first goal is a terrible basic error to put the ball back into the centre of the goal. There's no point saying he did fine when he was extremely poor. The second goal was just floated over him into the centre of goal. He made the strikers mind up by his positioning.No. People are just looking for reasons to wind themselves up.
He was fine. Pickford would've been a better choice but he's one of the best around.
1st goal I can excuse, if Mcneil follows the unmarked man right infront of him instead of standing and watching its cut out easily.First goal was a great reaction save. Keane caught ball watching for the initial ball in behind and then flinched at the rebound, making himself as small as possible. Tarkowski nowhere to be seen
Second goal was a Garner mistake and then Keane was caught ball watching in the middle of the park, Tarkowski didn't spot the danger and follow the runner. Good finish in a 1 on 1 situation
Not to blame at all was he!
Pickford is one of the best one on one keepers in the league, second only to Mordor's own1st goal I can excuse, if Mcneil follows the unmarked man right infront of him instead of standing and watching its cut out easily.
Second one he comes forward a little, thinks about coming to claim, eventually decides not to and tries to reposition too late. Pickford in particular would have raced out and collected the loose ball or made himself too close and too big to be chipped.
Loool the first goal is a class, instinctive save from a snap shot. Watch it back, the shot comes out of nowhere, is hit at pace and is going Top Corner.Pickford would have done better with both. The first goal is a terrible basic error to put the ball back into the centre of the goal. There's no point saying he did fine when he was extremely poor. The second goal was just floated over him into the centre of goal. He made the strikers mind up by his positioning.
It went to the LB position where Coleman had vacated tracking his runner, because the two CBs were ball watching.Pickford would have done better with both. The first goal is a terrible basic error to put the ball back into the centre of the goal. There's no point saying he did fine when he was extremely poor. The second goal was just floated over him into the centre of goal. He made the strikers mind up by his positioning.
