Pal my original response was due to
#7,706 of this thread.
I was saying Everton spent like the top 6th/7th team in the PL since Moshiri took over so expectation being 7th is fair.
The guy said Everton was not the only team that spent money but what if we compare with the like in West Ham (as I said earlier)? Ok, the comparison with Arsenal is a bit extreme but come on you can’t deny Everton spent the most outside the top 6.
You seem to think spending money means success, can you ask Manchester United if thats the case? Can you ask Leicester City if NET SPEND matters?
Sure we have spent more money than most since Moshiri took over, but when you spend over 50m on Yannick Bolaise and Davy Klaassen, does spending money even matter? Spending money and spending money wisely are different things really. Manchester United spent 200m on Pogba and Lukaku, do you consider that a good use of cashflow?
Net Spend last 5 Years Purchased Gross Sold Netspend Per Season
1 Manchester City £742,400,000 £232,550,000 £509,850,000 £101,970,000
2 Manchester United £611,630,000 £194,050,000 £417,580,000 £83,516,000
4 Chelsea £677,550,000 £434,850,000 £242,700,000 £48,540,000
3 Arsenal £385,740,000 £163,750,000 £221,990,000 £44,398,000
5 Everton £401,700,000 £197,000,000 £204,700,000 £40,940,000
6 Liverpool £578,750,000 £405,080,000 £173,670,000 £34,734,000
Over the last 5 years we have a higher NET SPEND than Liverpool, in that time they have sold 1 player for 150m and bought 2 for 70m each, they also have a wage bill that is double ours.
But sure mate, keep thinking NET SPEND is a metric you should judge teams on.
But yes, 7th is the last we should expect, but it doesnt mean we have a God given right to it cos we have spent a bit of dough.