Luke Garbutt

Try to keep him, or let him leave ?

  • Total voters
    308
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
BigBlueConk said:
Don't know what the fuss was about. I never doubted he would.
Click to expand...

Oh there was a fair chance he wouldn't.

He certainly has clauses in there like GrandOldTeam has said. Most likely ones that ensure he gets playing time if he's not out on loan.
 

Jxg said:
Oh there was a fair chance he wouldn't.

He certainly has clauses in there like GrandOldTeam has said. Most likely ones that ensure he gets playing time if he's not out on loan.
Click to expand...
Thats ridiculous if theres such a clause in his contract. No player should be guaranteed game time
 
Desperately needs to go out on loan as Baines is not ready to be benched yet. Needs to be at a decent PL club too, not just championship or relegation strugglers.
 

blukaku said:
Desperately needs to go out on loan as Baines is not ready to be benched yet. Needs to be at a decent PL club too, not just championship or relegation strugglers.
Click to expand...
We'll struggle to find a prem side that will loan him in as first choice, Bournemouth probably wouldve but thats seems to have gone quiet lately
 
sageyefc said:
Thats ridiculous if theres such a clause in his contract. No player should be guaranteed game time
Click to expand...
It's probably something along the lines of Bartra's at Barcelona. A buyout becomes activated if he plays less than. It's understandable - for his career he needs to play.
 
Adversus said:
It's probably something along the lines of Bartra's at Barcelona. A buyout becomes activated if he plays less than. It's understandable - for his career he needs to play.
Click to expand...
A player should earn his games, a manager hand shouldnt be forced to give game time to satisfy a clause in a contract.
 

Jxg said:
Hell if I know, I wasn't at the negotiation. Could be quite low and after a set amount of games played, it raises.



Yeah, although if he does stay I'd expect him to feature more.
Click to expand...
He featured loads last season and if Ovideo was sold would probably play a decent amount of this season too but I think we would be stronger keeping Ovideo this year.
 
sageyefc said:
A player should earn his games, a manager hand shouldnt be forced to give game time to satisfy a clause in a contract.
Click to expand...
It's not being forced. The manager can still decide but it just means that after a year if game time is still looking likely not to improve it's easier for the player to leave if he wants. Basically it removes the risk that he will rot on our bench indefinitely which sometimes is beyond his control if he's simply not good enough.

Barcelona had clauses in Deulofeu's contract with Sevilla and Emery still didn't play him.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top