Lukaku

[Coach]

It comes down to how close Everton were already to the cap, if they are able to add anything on to the allowable £4 million growth and also what the terms of the loans were.

Where do you get the £71m figure from?

2013 accounts say wages were £63m. +£4m for 2014 and +£4m for 2015?

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

It comes down to how close Everton were already to the cap, if they are able to add anything on to the allowable £4 million growth and also what the terms of the loans were.

The £4m increase limit only applies to TV revenue. Any other revenue increases can be added to the wage bill at the clubs discretion i.e. increases in matchday revenue and sponsorship deals

 

[terraloon]

Them remaining on the parent clubs payroll doesn't necessarily mean that they're included in any FFP wages calculation though.

As in the FL this piece states that loan players wages are deducted from the parent clubs total.

http://www.financialfairplay.co.uk/

Was aware of the FL rule but neither Chelsea, Everton or Man City are in the PL. also I haven't read that the wages are then charged to the club where the player goes on loan in the PL.

It would be to clubs like Chelsea & Man City to keep their wage spend high so its quite probable that in the case of say Lukaka the fee would have included minimal sums in relation to wages and the bulk of the fee may well have been scheduled as the sum that Chelsea will have amortised in respect of his transfer fee during the season. We just don't know how the fee is made up & that's why it would be reckless to just dismiss any FFP issues

 

[terraloon]

Where do you get the £71m figure from?

2013 accounts say wages were £63m. +£4m for 2014 and +£4m for 2015?

I did but on reflection its £67 next season .£71 in 2015/16

 

[terraloon]

The £4m increase limit only applies to TV revenue. Any other revenue increases can be added to the wage bill at the clubs discretion i.e. increases in matchday revenue and sponsorship deals

That's right its why I said

It comes down to how close Everton were already to the cap, if they are able to add anything on to the allowable £4 million growth and also what the terms of the loans were

 

[ianefc]

Imagine our window should there of been no added tv revenue, even though our operating cost surly must be lower

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

Was aware of the FL rule but neither Chelsea, Everton or Man City are in the PL. also I haven't read that the wages are then charged to the club where the player goes on loan in the PL.

It would be to clubs like Chelsea & Man City to keep their wage spend high so its quite probable that in the case of say Lukaka the fee would have included minimal sums in relation to wages and the bulk of the fee may well have been scheduled as the sum that Chelsea will have amortised in respect of his transfer fee during the season. We just don't know how the few is made up & that's why it would be reckless to just dismiss any FFP issues

You posted an FA rule as your proof, the FL would be supposedly covered by that 'rule' and that's not how it's being administered under their FFP calcualtion, therefore there's no reason to believe that the PL would operate in that way either.

 

[Jake Wignall]

Allegedly we have the money, Martinez wants him, why isn't the club moving forward to sign him? 20mil for a striker with his potential is a small amount in today's market.

 

[andybaker]

Roberto has said we will have a number 9 by the kick off.

We need to chill out. This is getting boring

 

[ToffeeLee83 - toffeelee83@hotmail.co.uk]

Roberto has said we will have a number 9 by the kick off.

We need to chill out. This is getting boring

Kone?

Roberto has said we will have a number 9 by the kick off.

We need to chill out. This is getting boring

 

[terraloon]

.A

You posted an FA rule as your proof, the FL would be supposedly covered by that 'rule' and that's not how it's being administered under their FFP calcualtion, therefore there's no reason to believe that the PL would operate in that way either.

Think you are mixing two things up here

The FA rule is about who pays the player and on which payroll they are shown

Neither the FL version of FFP nor indeed the PL version would overrule FA regulations.What we are talking about here is what is shown under the heading "wages in relation to FFP and in terms of a loan player what and how a club is charged .

Put quite simply some clubs don't charge anything to a club that takes one of their players on loan, some charge just a proportion of the wages, some charge the wages plus a premium,some only charge expenses and I believe some charge all of that as well as the amortised costs.

Without seeing the agreements that were in place we have no way of knowing.

All we do know is that neither Lukaka or Barry weren't their paid wages through Everton

 

[larrygobfiend]

Everton pied off a fair few of the higher earners at the club, made money in transfers and had an increase in TV money. Think we'll be okay for FFP to be honest.

 

[andybaker]

Kone?

I did think it was somewhat disrespectful to the number 9 he brought in himself last summer lol

Kone isnt going to be first choice is he. Ever!

 

[sageyefc]

Everton pied off a fair few of the higher earners at the club, made money in transfers and had an increase in TV money. Think we'll be okay for FFP to be honest.

Didnt bobby suntan say our wage bill is down like 30% at the last AGM

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

Think you are mixing two things up here

The FA rule is about who pays the player and on which payroll they are shown

Neither the FL version of FFP nor indeed the PL version would overrule FA regulations.What we are talking about here is what is shown under the heading "wages in relation to FFP and in terms of a loan player what and how club is charged .

So the FA regulation you posted is of no consequence and your original point that the club loaning the player wouldn't have their wages reflected in their total is surely wrong? As the FL calculation removes the wages of the loan player from the total wage bill of the loaning club for the purposes of the FFP calculation.